Those who don't believe in God or Jesus, why don't you? (852)
LoveableOne: Fine darl how are you?
I'm fine thanks sweetie pie!
------ This thread is Archived ------
RobertC2: I'm fine thanks sweetie pie!
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: it will be their own crap they end up standing in
That doesn't sound like an enjoyable experience. I think the jello pit would be more fun.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kidatheart: That doesn't sound like an enjoyable experience. I think the jello pit would be more fun.
hehe good to see you
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: Hehe I am trying not to. Shhhh if they do get the wrong impression their greycells defunct! Unlike duracells they are not reachargable. Like your posts by the way
Why, thank you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: Sorry that job I advertised for an arsewipe has already been filled.
but this guy is a dr. I am sure he would have a team of specialists with all kinds of whatever to make sure all you crap is clean and he would bill your insurance company,or govt
------ This thread is Archived ------
bay163: but this guy is a dr. I am sure he would have a team of specialists with all kinds of whatever to make sure all you crap is clean and he would bill your insurance company,or govt
Yes and I'm referring you to a proctologist for MRI to see what your brain is doing.------ This thread is Archived ------
Goodnight all, it was a pleasure-have a good day.
------ This thread is Archived ------
drbombay: Goodnight all, it was a pleasure-have a good day.
Take care, sleep well - and may the Sabbath bring you a nice lady to lunch and something really nice as a dessert!
------ This thread is Archived ------
bay163: but this guy is a dr. I am sure he would have a team of specialists with all kinds of whatever to make sure all you crap is clean and he would bill your insurance company,or govt
YOu don't get it do you, the crap inside me simply cannot be removed it is there on a permanent basis and I like it oozing out of every pore of my body thankyou!
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: This is an international forum or have you forgot. Now as regards english I also speak spanish, hebrew and learning arabic, now can you please tell me which one is more appropriate for you to converse in. Babble gets me where I want to go in my life, to places you will never ever go to because you simply ain't got the balls to step outside in to the big bad world we live in today.
Todah! Todah!
------ This thread is Archived ------
drbombay: Goodnight all, it was a pleasure-have a good day.
Goodnight Dr, have a good night and see you in the next cartoon full of madness!
------ This thread is Archived ------
RobertC2: Todah! Todah!
Muy bien amigo!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Why don't atheists and agnostics believe in religious mythologies? Because of a complete lack of any evidence. If you visited a newly discovered tribe living in the Amazon basin who grew up oblivious to outside mythologies, do you honestly believe you could convince them? It has been tried and failed; the tribe converted the missionary.
If you want atheists and agnostics to believe, there's only one way, and it's not more dogma and diatribe: perform one of the claims of the supernatural from the book o' blood. Go to a hospital morgue with the non-believer and raise someone from the dead, such as a person who was dismembered in a car accident three days ago, thus could not be simply comatose and alive. (Other demonstrations of the supernatural that defy rational explanation would also suffice, such as separating the water between Florida and Cuba.)
If you can bring the person back to life, we'll believe because it's something inexplicable by rational thinking and science. If you can't do it, your "god" doesn't exist. If you won't even try to do it, it means you know your "god" doesn't exist. If you say, "You don't test 'god'!", you are afraid to admit you can't prove it. Regardless of which, it's claim in the buybull, therefore the burden of proof lies with the religious who claim it's possible, not with those who refute it.
If anyone disagrees about the burden of proof, remember this: the burden of proof I'm demanding, false until proven true, is the same burden of proof used in a court of law: innocent until proven guilty. Those expecting different burdens of proof (one for their religion, a different one for themselves) are hypocrites: if one wants "true until proven false" for one's mythology, then to be ethically consistent one would have to accept being guilty until proven innocent if one were ever charged with a crime.
Also note the other fact which most ardently religious people ignore, gloss over, or (sometimes) lie about: admitting that you (the religious) can't prove there is a "god" doesn't prevent you from believing in it. All it does is prevent you from imposing religion on others, which is all that atheists and agnostics are asking for. Nobody is asking you not to believe, only to keep it in your church and home and out of schools, law and government. (Discussion and debate sites are no-man's-land where anything goes.)
For any non-believers reading this, remember and quote these phrases whenever someone asks you "Why don't you believe?":
Put up or shut up.
Show it or stow it.
Evidence, not avoidance.
Demonstrate, don't remonstrate.
Also remember that most fervently anti-religious countries are those where there is only one religion or dogma and it bans the practice of others to prevent competition. A secular society is not an atheist society.
If you want atheists and agnostics to believe, there's only one way, and it's not more dogma and diatribe: perform one of the claims of the supernatural from the book o' blood. Go to a hospital morgue with the non-believer and raise someone from the dead, such as a person who was dismembered in a car accident three days ago, thus could not be simply comatose and alive. (Other demonstrations of the supernatural that defy rational explanation would also suffice, such as separating the water between Florida and Cuba.)
If you can bring the person back to life, we'll believe because it's something inexplicable by rational thinking and science. If you can't do it, your "god" doesn't exist. If you won't even try to do it, it means you know your "god" doesn't exist. If you say, "You don't test 'god'!", you are afraid to admit you can't prove it. Regardless of which, it's claim in the buybull, therefore the burden of proof lies with the religious who claim it's possible, not with those who refute it.
If anyone disagrees about the burden of proof, remember this: the burden of proof I'm demanding, false until proven true, is the same burden of proof used in a court of law: innocent until proven guilty. Those expecting different burdens of proof (one for their religion, a different one for themselves) are hypocrites: if one wants "true until proven false" for one's mythology, then to be ethically consistent one would have to accept being guilty until proven innocent if one were ever charged with a crime.
Also note the other fact which most ardently religious people ignore, gloss over, or (sometimes) lie about: admitting that you (the religious) can't prove there is a "god" doesn't prevent you from believing in it. All it does is prevent you from imposing religion on others, which is all that atheists and agnostics are asking for. Nobody is asking you not to believe, only to keep it in your church and home and out of schools, law and government. (Discussion and debate sites are no-man's-land where anything goes.)
For any non-believers reading this, remember and quote these phrases whenever someone asks you "Why don't you believe?":
Put up or shut up.
Show it or stow it.
Evidence, not avoidance.
Demonstrate, don't remonstrate.
Also remember that most fervently anti-religious countries are those where there is only one religion or dogma and it bans the practice of others to prevent competition. A secular society is not an atheist society.
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: This is an international forum or have you forgot. Now as regards english I also speak spanish, hebrew and learning arabic, now can you please tell me which one is more appropriate for you to converse in. Babble gets me where I want to go in my life, to places you will never ever go to because you simply ain't got the balls to step outside in to the big bad world we live in today.
????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ???????!
------ This thread is Archived ------
K_rational: Why don't atheists and agnostics believe in religious mythologies? Because of a complete lack of any evidence. If you visited a newly discovered tribe living in the Amazon basin who grew up oblivious to outside mythologies, do you honestly believe you could convince them? It has been tried and failed; the tribe converted the missionary.
If you want atheists and agnostics to believe, there's only one way, and it's not more dogma and diatribe: perform one of the claims of the supernatural from the book o' blood. Go to a hospital morgue with the non-believer and raise someone from the dead, such as a person who was dismembered in a car accident three days ago, thus could not be simply comatose and alive. (Other demonstrations of the supernatural that defy rational explanation would also suffice, such as separating the water between Florida and Cuba.)
If you can bring the person back to life, we'll believe because it's something inexplicable by rational thinking and science. If you can't do it, your "god" doesn't exist. If you won't even try to do it, it means you know your "god" doesn't exist. If you say, "You don't test 'god'!", you are afraid to admit you can't prove it. Regardless of which, it's claim in the buybull, therefore the burden of proof lies with the religious who claim it's possible, not with those who refute it.
If anyone disagrees about the burden of proof, remember this: the burden of proof I'm demanding, false until proven true, is the same burden of proof used in a court of law: innocent until proven guilty. Those expecting different burdens of proof (one for their religion, a different one for themselves) are hypocrites: if one wants "true until proven false" for one's mythology, then to be ethically consistent one would have to accept being guilty until proven innocent if one were ever charged with a crime.
Also note the other fact which most ardently religious people ignore, gloss over, or (sometimes) lie about: admitting that you (the religious) can't prove there is a "god" doesn't prevent you from believing in it. All it does is prevent you from imposing religion on others, which is all that atheists and agnostics are asking for. Nobody is asking you not to believe, only to keep it in your church and home and out of schools, law and government. (Discussion and debate sites are no-man's-land where anything goes.)
For any non-believers reading this, remember and quote these phrases whenever someone asks you "Why don't you believe?":
Put up or shut up.
Show it or stow it.
Evidence, not avoidance.
Demonstrate, don't remonstrate.
Also remember that most fervently anti-religious countries are those where there is only one religion or dogma and it bans the practice of others to prevent competition. A secular society is not an atheist society.
If you want atheists and agnostics to believe, there's only one way, and it's not more dogma and diatribe: perform one of the claims of the supernatural from the book o' blood. Go to a hospital morgue with the non-believer and raise someone from the dead, such as a person who was dismembered in a car accident three days ago, thus could not be simply comatose and alive. (Other demonstrations of the supernatural that defy rational explanation would also suffice, such as separating the water between Florida and Cuba.)
If you can bring the person back to life, we'll believe because it's something inexplicable by rational thinking and science. If you can't do it, your "god" doesn't exist. If you won't even try to do it, it means you know your "god" doesn't exist. If you say, "You don't test 'god'!", you are afraid to admit you can't prove it. Regardless of which, it's claim in the buybull, therefore the burden of proof lies with the religious who claim it's possible, not with those who refute it.
If anyone disagrees about the burden of proof, remember this: the burden of proof I'm demanding, false until proven true, is the same burden of proof used in a court of law: innocent until proven guilty. Those expecting different burdens of proof (one for their religion, a different one for themselves) are hypocrites: if one wants "true until proven false" for one's mythology, then to be ethically consistent one would have to accept being guilty until proven innocent if one were ever charged with a crime.
Also note the other fact which most ardently religious people ignore, gloss over, or (sometimes) lie about: admitting that you (the religious) can't prove there is a "god" doesn't prevent you from believing in it. All it does is prevent you from imposing religion on others, which is all that atheists and agnostics are asking for. Nobody is asking you not to believe, only to keep it in your church and home and out of schools, law and government. (Discussion and debate sites are no-man's-land where anything goes.)
For any non-believers reading this, remember and quote these phrases whenever someone asks you "Why don't you believe?":
Put up or shut up.
Show it or stow it.
Evidence, not avoidance.
Demonstrate, don't remonstrate.
Also remember that most fervently anti-religious countries are those where there is only one religion or dogma and it bans the practice of others to prevent competition. A secular society is not an atheist society.
Interesting read and link, thankyou
------ This thread is Archived ------
LaVerdad: This is an international forum or have you forgot. Now as regards english I also speak spanish, hebrew and learning arabic, now can you please tell me which one is more appropriate for you to converse in. Babble gets me where I want to go in my life, to places you will never ever go to because you simply ain't got the balls to step outside in to the big bad world we live in today.
Hablando en hebreo, podrían interferir en los cristianos!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
wildatheart2: ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ???????!
You made me laugh with that, very good!! No many people read between the lines these days!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Nature
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
your personality
1830's Music
everything is changing
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Common Issues with the BMW X1
Icebergs Still Around
rarotonga
How far is too far?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Fine darl how are you?