That question tells anyone reading this thread the height of your intelligence.
Muslims in a Christian church
You're right, my bad, I thought England had a Church of England. I thought it was a universal church covering all English people as so deemed by England's worthless holy monarchy.
galrads: You're right, my bad, I thought England had a Church of England. I thought it was a universal church covering all English people as so deemed by England's worthless holy monarchy.
actually i'm sure you are correct and you shouldn't have apologized, "i enjoyed the snark".
i am sure there are muslims in the church, since the pope has pontificated chrislam as viable religion, and also stated westerners must make the invaders welcome...And i'm sure we will see nancy pelosilini washing more criminal alien foot soldiers feet in a few months or so.
to take it a step further and flip the script...the mossad has in the past infiltrated several different muslim sects.
RayfromUSA: It's not just a law. It's an article of the Bill of Rights, the most important part of the US constitution. Without which the people would not have accepted the constitution at all.
It's not about hunting. It's about having the means to fight back against tyranny. And tyranny loves the idea of disarming the people.
I'm not a US citizen Ray but that is exactly how I understand the issue - that having fought off the British King and determine your independence the Constitution and Bill of Rights was created for fair governance and that 'the people' would always have more power than anyone in positions in the government.
The issue of gun crime is very different from gun control and gun control (ie taking guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens) will NEVER solve gun crime ... simply because GUN CRIMINALS don't heed the law anyway!
State Right to Bear Arms in Ohio Last updated November 8, 2016. Article I, § 4 of the Ohio Constitution provides: “The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.” The Supreme Court of Ohio held this provision “secures to every person a fundamental individual right to bear arms for ‘their defense and security.'” (Emphasis omitted.)1 The right to bear arms under Article I, § 4 is not unlimited, however, but is subject to the reasonable exercise by municipalities of their police power under article XVIII, § 3 of the Ohio Constitution.2
In Arnold, the supreme court rejected a challenge to Cleveland’s ordinance banning the possession and sale of assault weapons, holding that although a municipality could not ban all firearms, Cleveland’s ban on assault weapons was reasonable and did not violate article I, § 4.3
Ten years later, in Klein v. Leis, the court held that Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 2923.12 and 2923.16, which at the time prohibited the carrying of concealed firearms, were constitutional notwithstanding article I, § 4.4 The court opined that while article I, § 4 does create a fundamental right, the right is subject to reasonable limitations, and “there is no constitutional right to bear concealed weapons.”5 Sections 2923.12 and 2923.16 regulated the manner in which firearms could be carried, and the court noted that such regulations have long been accepted as reasonable limitations under article I, § 4.6 Subsequent to Klein, the Ohio Legislature amended the law regarding concealed weapons, and under current law an individual may be licensed to carry a concealed handgun. For more information, please see the Concealed Weapons Permitting in Ohio section.
In addition to rejecting article I, § 4 challenges to Cleveland’s ban on assault weapons and the state ban on carrying concealed weapons, Ohio courts have rejected similar challenges to the following regulations:
Dayton’s requirement that owners and purchasers of handguns obtain identification cards;7 Cincinnati’s prohibition on possession of semiautomatic firearms and high-capacity magazines;8 Cleveland’s prohibition of the manufacture, possession, sale, or purchase of .32 caliber (or less) handguns with barrel-lengths of less than three inches;9 Akron’s prohibition on firearm possession by convicted felons;10 and Toledo’s extensive firearms ordinance prohibiting certain classes of persons from possessing firearms, requiring identification cards to acquire or possess handguns, requiring firearms dealers to be licensed and keep certain records, and prohibiting the carrying of firearms in vehicles.11 Finally, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected an article I, § 4 challenge to a Columbus ordinance banning assault weapons (although the ordinance was overturned on other grounds).12
"This debate has gone on for years and probably will never be satisfied to everybody`s expectations. What do you believe?. Should all guns be banned or do you believe that your rights supercede the rights of innocents to live?"
The OP is a classic "Either Or" reasoning fallacy.
But since this reasoning fallacy comes from somebody who can't think of anything to do with a gun, besides taking the life of innocents: the OP and everybody who agrees with the first post should never be allowed to own a gun.
mykingdomforanam: "This debate has gone on for years and probably will never be satisfied to everybody`s expectations. What do you believe?. Should all guns be banned or do you believe that your rights supercede the rights of innocents to live?"
The OP is a classic "Either Or" reasoning fallacy.
But since this reasoning fallacy comes from somebody who can't think of anything to do with a gun, besides taking the life of innocents: the OP and everybody who agrees with the first post should never be allowed to own a gun.
Waterbearer63: This debate has gone on for years and probably will never be satisfied to everybody`s expectations. What do you believe?. Should all guns be banned or do you believe that your rights supercede the rights of innocents to live.
"or do you believe that your rights supersede the right of innocents to live..."
Dissolve America. The south can be a oil-dependent and deeply religious desert where lazy people wander around with weapons like they do in Saudi Arabia. Progessives tried to push things too far, leave your opponents to themselves and their own fight with evolution, then you fight the winner.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
How stupid are you?
That question tells anyone reading this thread the height of your intelligence.
Muslims in a Christian church