Hey, R! Yeah, I do remember...in fact, that was one of my MOMENTS. David Bowie singing "Space Oddity" in the early seventies on my black and white TV (talk about being dated!).
Interesting...why did you think to ask me that??
Roh, I also like his "sequel" to Space Oddity...I think it's simply called Space Oddity Two, but I'm not sure. In it he reflects more about Major Tom's experiences and legend on Earth.
David was/is something of a genius, I think. Definitely inimitable.
God, several of them, G. I remember saying "Huh?" when Jim Morrison and the Doors came on singing Light My Fire. I remember pausing in a Wisconsin small-town store when Alice Cooper belted out "School's Out." The time in a mall when I froze upon hearing Enya's "Exile." My eyes opened wide upon hearing Loreena McKennitt's "All Souls Night." Sting's "Synchronicity" one summer in Colorado. Oyster Cult's "Reaper" one evening on the radio.
I've heard this before, A (maybe from you?), but I have no idea what you're basing these accusations on. Alex Jones seems legit to me. Is there any evidence you can point me to that would support your claims about him?
I'm wondering why it took you so long to bring this subject up, L. I had the strangest sense of deja vu...as though someone had already discussed that very issue with you...
I'd agree that being in good physical shape and making some serious effort to be more attractive VASTLY increases the odds of finding someone and having a successful romantic relationship. Someone who does those things not only looks better - they are more vigorous and healthy and confident and basically feel better about themselves overall. All things being equal, of course.
You Canadians were sold the same bill of goods that we Americans were. "Freedom of choice"? It's all about geopolitics - money and power - as usual. Just as with all wars.
You could vote for someone, and they could fail to take the promised actions which earned your vote - in which case, your only responsibility would be to remove them from office (if possible). Obviously, if you can't remove them from office, you're not responsible for their actions. This elides the question of whether or not there even exists a meaningful choice among the various candidates. I see no point in voting for anyone if they don't represent my views. I see a point in the "none of the above" option - it says I do not sanction any of these people (or, perhaps, the system they represent).
Okay, well, if you're conscripted, clearly the base of responsibility shifts to the conscriptor. It's as though I put a gun to your head and told you to shoot another person. The moral responsibility lies with the person placing a gun to your head - or at least the bulk of that responsibility.
How could you be best friends with someone you didn't like?
Seriously, of course you should. Your desire's already there - trying to suppress or hide that is likely going to negatively effect your friendship anyway. If you're rejected romantically, there's no reason why your friendship can't resume - unless you don't allow it to. After all, the only difference between the two scenarios is that in one case your best friend knows the truth. How can you live a lie with your best friend without severely compromising your relationship?
Well, if a government has those kinds of rules for military conflict, you surely bear a responsibility for joining its military (knowing that). I certainly wouldn't place all the blame on "politicians." They require fools or obedient servants/civilians to implement their policies.
Let's say you live in a country with an unjust government. I see a fairly large difference between not actively joining branches of that government which enforce draconian rules and actively joining those branches. You're clearly making the choice to become part of its evil when you choose to actively assist its policies, no?
What responsibility do you think individual soldiers bear for their actions? Aren't you responsible for joining the military? Aren't you responsible for assessing the morality of a given military campaign (for example, attacking/bombing a city where innocents will be killed, or fighting for an unjust/immoral cause)?
RE: Do girls gotta doeverything far better than boys just to stay equal?