But you did say "so what?" did you not, Polar? That seems to imply that his opinions/feelings aren't that important on this matter, no? If not, what did the "so what" mean - unless you were just joking, of course.
I mean, it could be considered a crime against God (or at least certain gods - e.g., Dionysus/Bacchus) not to expose the bounty which nature has intended to be viewed?
Then why wouldn't forbidding them by law to wear a veil in the first place have a similar response?
Though I can see protests of such a policy, I would think the fuss would be less from selectively requiring an Islamic lady to remove her burqa or whatever as opposed to forcing them not to wear them in all public occasions. Don't you think so?
GG has a friend and work-comrade who converted to Islam and now wears Islamic garb (she lives and works mostly in Canada). GG's not comfortable with Islamic attitudes toward women - nor am I!!! - but respects her right to make that choice.
Well, to take an extreme example by way of illustration, consider that if you're married. Would it not be a significant lapse to, at a minimum, place that fact in one's profile?
The only "security issue," methinks, is the insecurity of those who cannot deal with people having different religious beliefs/practices.
And I say that as one who abhors Islamic suppression of women and the whole idiotic "modesty" thing. I'd like to see that eliminated from the face of the Earth, but not by law. Rather, we must persuade people to voluntarily reconsider their silly beliefs. However, they have a right to them.
Just completed a quick overview of countries legally mandating burqas/face-coverage. It seems the majority of Islamic countries (that is, countries which the majority are Muslim) don't have such a policy.
Oh - just checked your profile. No mention of involvement with anyone. I think that would be appropriate for the early stages of dating, but at some point would become inappropriate - and rather insulting to your man.
If you changed your profile to reflect your being in a relationship, then I can't see a strong objection being made. If your profile suggests you're still single and available (by not mentioning you're in a relationship), then I'd say he's within his rights to be concerned. Would you be?
It does in fact does *not* seem to be the case, according to your own quote, that Western women (or even non-Western women) are required to cover their face (wear a burqa).
"It is not necessary for a foreign woman, or even Iranian women, to wear the chador, the one-piece cloak traditionally associated with the country.It is however essential for them to cover all parts of the body except the hand, feet and face (from hairline to neckline), and to ensure that the outer layer of clothing gives no hint of the shape of the body.
"Standard dress for Western women in Iran tends to be a full-length skirt, or a long-sleeved shirt and trousers (jeans are okay), worn underneath a loose-fitting, below-the-knees, black or dark-blue coat. A large, plain, dark headscraft should cover the hair and neck (a hat will not do) and thick socks should cover any visible parts of the legs. Apart from plain rings, jewelry and makeup should be discreet to the point of invisibility."
So there are some restrictions, but they don't include covering the face.
Well, not all burka designs completely cover the face, correct? Some reveal fair a portion of the face (looking at photos of them online).
If people want to wear masks or whatever, I don't see why, in appropriate circumstances (when their identity reasonably should be ascertained) that they couldn't be compelled to remove them. But I don't see a rationale for a blanket ban, other than asserting cultural dominance.
I think your "wise guy" hypothesis may stem from failing to read "WESTERN women" in my post. In other words, I wasn't aware that Western women visiting Islamic countries were compelled by law to wear veils. Perhaps in some they are, for all I know. But that's not something I've read or heard.
As far as "laws of the lands" dictating...well, I would think it's too obvious for words to point out that a law and justice may be two separate things. Otherwise, you could refute objections to the Holocaust or Pol Pot's massacre by referencing the "law of the land."
RE: Is it right for your CS-found-bf/gf to tell you to cancel your account once you started dating?
I think you had your priorities well in order, Bob.