You assigned characteristics to those of my belief system (atheism). Since it is my belief system, I took exception.
When I did, you denigrated my own characterization of my own belief system, claiming I could call it whatever I wanted, but that "science" agreed with you.
I asked you for your source for that contention. You denigrated that request as well, managing in the course to suggest I was ill-educated.
I object now to your contention that "basic known things" need no citation of sources. If they are as you claim, sources should abound.
I've offered no speculation whatsoever about your own belief system. May I suggest, in the future, you adopt a similiar practice?
What do I mean, source? You have claimed that "science" recognizes some functions as "laws." I should like to know what source you can cite to support this contention. Those with an above-average education understand what citing a source means.
This probably won't make you feel any better, but...it's not just Kuwait. Probably the biggest single frustration for anyone on CS, no matter their location, is that the ones with whom they share mutual attraction are so far away they might as well be on the moon.
Still, lightning does strike. Hang in there, and don't sweat it too much. Maybe tomorrow. You never can know.
Like any other method of meeting a significant other, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Also like any other method, it usually takes some time.
I do think online meeting is becoming more commonplace. Not long ago it would have raised some eyebrows.
Dagosto Forum Posts (3,076)
is also right.
RE: Lets pair up the CS forum users
Maybe you could bribe the OP.