L - Despite the instinct to do so, running from a bear is potentially literally a grave mistake. They react by running towards you, as your running makes them think you are prey, and they are a lot faster than you. Instead, nonchalantly back away slowly, without looking them in the eyes and while doing so, keep obstacles in between you and them.
Yeah OG, ability to communicate well, would be prerequisite even for a senator, representative, governor, mayor, or diplomat. But, Trump obviously wasn't elected because he's appropriate, experienced, nor deserving of the position. Regardless, it's just one of the many reasons, he should not be re-elected.
It was concise by YOUR definition. I read the first part, and that was more than enough for me to realize, that they did not know what they were talking about. It would have been rejected by any science magazine who had a virologist on staff, or as a consultant.
c - There's obviously nothing wrong with Obama's cognitive function. I didn't even notice a list of keywords. When I used to speak at seminars, I used to rely on a list of topic keywords to ensure, that I covered all topics that I wanted. Plus, slides used to also jog memory of when to cover a topic. I never read off a teleprompter.
Trump has trouble making complete sentences.
g - I agree with you. Both Bill Clinton and Obama are both well educated and very good speakers. I enjoyed listening to both.
We have that same saying here. But, in Trump case, it's more a pig's butt.
m - Thanks for relating your impression of Ms. Trump's book. While I'm sure Trump's father was contributory to how he turned out, I don't fully blame it on him. How a person behaves is ultimately owned by the individual, when they become an adult. While we all were influenced by our parents, we are unique and make our own choices. One can allow parents to steer one's life, one can rebel, or one can use it as a jumping point and grow. I'm sure that I am not the same as my parents, nor are most people. Trump needs to stop blaming others and own, that he is responsible for his actions.
O - That doesn't necessarily imply overconfidence, but rather preparedness. Indeed, debates will certainly focus on what Biden's & Trump's plans are. We know Trump's real plan is to further divide the US until it goes down in flames, while enriching corporate donors, lining his own pockets, tell 15,000 more lies, blame everything on someone else, and get a lot more golfing done at the taxpayer's expense.
That's true, not only in Florida. Trump made it worse, rather than better. Once again, the dishonest narcissist does the opposite of what the experts recommend and this time it's cost many lives.
Since Trump is a known criminal, the FBI under several administrations monitored Trump's activities. It has nothing to do with Obama. It had to do with Trump's criminal activity and the FBI.
Regardless, that has NOTHING to do with this speech. Stay on topic.
Yeah, they certainly weren't at Walmart or Rite-Aid. I checked. Soap & water is probably better anyway, as we know that isn't toxic to us. Just expose the virus to 2 minutes of soap & water and that will do the trick much more cheaply without the human toxicity dangers, unless you try to inhale it, inject it, or drink it.
Thanks for the update. Thankfully, it only appears to be a category 1, or 2 at most. Still, it would be better if the people in the coastal regions evacuated until the storm passes, especially in the Corpus Christi area.
Hopefully, Hannah doesn't have meaner sisters, or brothers.
He's already thrown out the Constitution in several executive order attempts, and with his turning of the military on peaceful protesters. Lets not forget his repeated obstruction of justice cases during Mueller's investigation, as well as his lying to Mueller in writing. He also committed quid pro quo and for help from an adversarial foreign power to win an election. So, we can certainly expect other violations, while he's still in office. Indeed, the more he gets away with (temporarily), the more he feels empowered to do worse.
The Supreme Court will be able to make a decision, and it's possible (but unlikely) that a re-election would be part of that decision. Much more likely, would be the decision, that there was insufficient evidence, to indicate that a significant amount of the votes were fraudulent, especially if the overall counts are not close.
JimNastics Blog Comments (11,843)
Picking (Tom) Cotton