And the young will spend more time, not less, tending to an ageing population precisely because it let everyone down. One thing about becoming more like the developing world is that it's good for the family so thanks for leaving us nothing at all. You can be glad that love works nothing like karma, it's nowhere near as transactional as that.
I say it was the baby boomers who instated full reward without service, but it's actually before them we're looking at the silent generation. Those who were 21 in 1961 missed all the real wars but got the post-war prosperity, then in his middle aged 1980s the decision was made to play pass the parcel with a single dollar bill and call it a trillion dollars in the bank, and then spend it. And then this person was dead or retired before 2008(the consequences of his actions).
Now the irony is that this person was born in 1940. Peak entitlement and selfishness comes from those whose parents would have given their lives for you. All you can say to that is no good deed goes unpunished.
No, I argue that health fundamentally rejects capitalism as a way of behaving - I.e. The more help you are given the less you help yourself.. People don’t eat their 5 a day knowing how expensive it is to see a doctor; in reality this is precisely the thing that doesn’t happen.
I can’t stress how grateful we are to have the NHS in this country and we’d never get rid of it through our own free will. But the NHS was founded by the greatest generation, they were patriots who performed more national service and this is why we got a national health service. To be British meant something and one of the things it meant was not dying on the streets.
Why don’t you offer national service in exchange for nationalised healthcare?
You fill the farms with kids giving up their summers and people who used to work in the insurance industry. You nationalise the Byzantine bureaucracy in order to fire two thirds of it, you’re in a situation where you’d rather throw $10 in the bin than give it to somebody in need. A little trust, a little give and take could go a long way in such a situation to convince America that a basic standard of living is in the national interest of America and national service could be thing to do that.
We start out in the caves in an equals peoples fisticuffs, and then we invent guns which allowed the redcoat victory over the Zulu warriors, and when gun and technics defeat the red-blooded words become society’s primary weapon. The truth is you can chart the decline of Mano o Mano going back centuries.
Saying anything true will require an increasing level of skill. The way that you say things completely replaces the idea that truth has a value in itself. It’s the law of the affluent to develop this way, there’s no way of creating a better life for your kids without making them less of a man for that.
And then there’s their kids who have lived in the country all their life. They end up stabbing people a lot. Their parents gratitude isn’t passed on to the next generation and I feel that white liberals might be a reason for that.
I suppose that modesty is a type of self-control. Would I rather settle or be on here at 60?
And it’s not like I have one night in my 20s where I slept with someone way way above my league by being incredibly easy to sleep with. And the memory of that night haunts me forever meaning I can never be content with what I can realistically get when I’m old and wrinkly. Man was, is and forever will be more accepting of growing older.
An element of “this’ll” do has to remain or nothing would get done on a planet of 4 billion women.
And then we are left with the plain truth that the oldendaysers loved their families more. A better life for your kids depends on limited fickleness and indecision, a willingness to compromise and make tough decisions which is actually part and parcel with compromise. Swept off your feet isn’t your decision no you want a woman with greater loyalty you can’t live your whole marriage with her on the backfoot the woman will leave you when you’re at your weakest moments. An element of duty or humility has to remain.
Because they're looking for something that goes beyond fun and actually turns quite nasty. All the hallmarks of today's fast-food culture of instant gratification are there contrasted with a need to get what she's never had(i.e. inconvenience, rough treatment)along with a sort of nurturing gone haywire.
Lock them up and throw away the key is a realistic alternative therefore it becomes a choice to kill a defenceless prisoner. If you’re killing them today it’s for cheapskate reasons far more than needs must, and it will only grow more this way unless civilisation collapses for some other reason.
One reason I keep talking about fate is to face circumstances not of your making to whatever end. We are stronger men and women than we could ever choose because we are a better man than we know, but a worse person than we think.
No, but you don’t have to look for the opportunity to release criminals back into the community at every turn. People are not as fluid as you seem to think they are.
The establishment failed to capitalise on Facebook.
To be honest it seems to like the establishment gave up on democracy in the 1930s. I think they built a garden after the war for their kids on condition experts make the rules - the aim was to never have it so good and stop democracy doing what it did in the 1930s - but the garden fell years ago and then there was only the established media left.
I have a lot of memories. Mostly the travel and blamming in her face. But sometimes you have to go round the world to realise the value of a British wife you meet locally and spontaneously.
What you have to remember is that life and knowledge are two completely different things because very often the less accurate depiction of reality is itself the better fate. The people closest to reality in general are the mildly depressed and the averaged opinion of the general public, and you have to question that.
You could be eccentric or a gold-plated maniac and still not be more free than anybody else. An exception to the rule is created by the rule. People would initially go mad believing there are no rules anymore before accepting fate. Karma could be the stepping stone.
We can sum America up with the words don't get even, get angry. The political correctness of polite society and the warrior PR of the lepers needs to duke it out in a war between the adverts.
A useful blast from the past would be the village bobby. As a rule you see the same police officer or small group of police officers and they should be the same colour as you and the people around you.
We live in an era today where people like the police because we don't have things like capital punishment. In Britain 80% like the police instead of the 80% hatred we felt before and this cooperation is appreciated. The police used to be an organised mob; private security for the richest members of society pitted against everybody else. But today many crimes are solved by having some sort of rapport with the public and access to the information they have, which is just as well because you struggle to lock people up without any real evidence. You need to have insight and that's what the fear won't give you.
“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends”
Gandalf
I don't really believe in Karma although I can see the use of doing so. In my view life is a lottery of fates.
Which is how the people who support Jesus most could behave like him least. America. The world won't literally end because of America, but all its spiritual depth will. Materialism won.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: water from chernobyl
Tell us the bit where your hair falls out and you grow balls on your back