Men are more cutthroat capitalist tending to be the best and worst example of something. Natural inequality.
Women are more like the welfare state and cosy capitalism. Nets and ceilings, things you need or a partner are more easily got and mistakes more easily forgiven but dissatisfaction is born on easy street. Challenges are not worthy of you, you don't trust life as a breeze and the men who make it that easy for you(normally because they're only after one thing). Woman is a being untested, a being of the middle.
A man's means have become redundant, but a woman's wiles have not. Hard power is now the result of government and industry, no generation in history has competed on the basis of soft power to the extent we do and for that reason you will find it's mostly men falling behind.
Assortative mating. Each person is becoming more likely to marry a member of their own class.
What this means is that middle class men struggle to find a good mother who considers children more than a mere appendage to her life. The wealthy woman has become like the wealthy man in a situation too selfish for children.
In the working class it’s male wage decline and the dysfunction and degeneracy. Prole men of the west have gone to the dogs under global capitalism. Working class women have been insulated from the disruption by children. At the bottom the women are better than the men.
In reality there’s about a 20% chance of going extinct this century. Environmentalists and evangelicals are probably not looking at doomsday in consumer capitalism or gay marriage, just a more sterile world.
Modern parenting and mass immigration. Rather than reforming modernity we fill the country with people hit as a child by loving parents for the competence they bring to us. We import people who were raised by conservatives to do what needs to be done.
"get a proper job" has an element of truth to it. Kids don't leave education with the skills they need in the real world and I chiefly blame the liberals for that. We need to separate the "get a proper job" that would have us working down a coal mine all our life from the "get a proper job" that provides our ability to concentrate and focus, the ability to choose to do something not because it is easy but because it is hard promotes the role of a stern father.
My problem is virtue-signalling over the issue. There are too many people whose only skill is to talk or express their "creativity" and you look at older conservative types - who many not even believe in climate change - to do the kicking of the kids into STEM. We can't resolve the problem on good intentions alone we need the discipline of the nasty people even if they are hypocrites who lose a foot to obesity and talk of personal responsibility. The wrong people can be right for the wrong reasons.
We're on the cusp of something bigger than electricity was and although I am a gas engineer I look forward to the end of fossil fuels for the level playing field it opens us. In old industries big boys capture the market and establish monoploy none of which is good for our longterm development. On a new frontier merit wins the day because nobody can win based on the position they inherit. Because there isn't a position to inherit, it's actually you doing the developing.
We pretend property is worth something around twice as much as it is so that property-owners and shareholders can live the life of riley. The youth exist to cater to this landed and inherited wealth with little prospect of owning the material things you do need - like the roof over your head. Any money they do have gets largely spent on toys and distractions, the things that do matter are beyond you because older people lived far beyond their means and are now forcing you to pay a price they're not worthy of.
Yea. But the economy is setup to borrow money and make impulse purchases, we don't normally care like we care about cars which to be fair are a good example of what happens when we apply ourselves more. I'm frankly delighted with the miles we get to a gallon.
I sleep like a baby every night unless someone dies. The truth is I get something out of being negative, my underlying sense is that it'll be fine. Nothing I do could ever possibly be as bad as the shaftings of fate I've been through before, and if fate shafts me again there really isn't anyone to be upset at.
It depends on the personality. The typical person in the age of information is not well-informed because you live as you would like, you’re not coerced into doing things like hearing what you don’t want to hear or experiencing experiences you don’t want to experience. Traditionally you were forced into knowing and if something was boring that wasn’t an excuse to ignore it. In the old days adult life just happened to you whether you chose it or not.
Which means that in the modern day the only people informed are weirdoes. People with an honest to god thing for knowing about things. Freaks who choose adulthood in spite of an infantilised world.
Yet the lucky ones don’t necessarily feel lucky. The nice life through luck is liable to develop general anxiety in society, there’s a high maintenance there and absence of real world trauma meaning that we are no longer desensitised to bad luck, bad times etc.
Building the wall targets people who possess firearms illegally and tighter regulations are there to make sure that the legal owners of guns are responsible adults. The wall is protection with the intention of making America look less like a battlefield I would have thought.
Because at the end of the day civilisation requires a viable area larger in size than gun free zones. The wholesale increase in the price of bullets would be much more effective.
The alternatives to prison are either expensive or unpleasant. Taxing the successful to moderate the crimes of losers. Sterilising the socially irresponsible. That isn’t free to fail.
Long story short it's essential for her to feel that you are a wanted man - not necessarily a desperate criminal on the run from the law although this seems to be her favourite. The point is that she can only want what is already wanted and difficult to capture.
A woman is liable to write off a whole room full of people as deplorable. The reason you find them deplorable could not be because you are heartless which is the problem for those who pride themselves on their wellspring of compassion. In times when you're not as nice as you think you are the innocent around you become guilty to save face.
This is why you blame neither you nor her but some immaterial third party like the ether - mistakes were made, the ether is to blame. Women would be highly effective in politics if they were political in that way as opposed to extremely political in a personal sense.
You have to be the bad guy because it's never her fault. Blaming you for her own flaws or selfish behaviours isn't something I would take personally because we know how narcissistic the woman is, it's in her DNA. They're even prone to character assassinate their own kids sons and daughters.
Complimeting the least obvious thing she invests herself into heart and soul. Accessories for example. Or compliment the soul directly and go for the eyes.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Why is there so much other-gender hatred in the cs forums ?
Men are more cutthroat capitalist tending to be the best and worst example of something. Natural inequality.Women are more like the welfare state and cosy capitalism. Nets and ceilings, things you need or a partner are more easily got and mistakes more easily forgiven but dissatisfaction is born on easy street. Challenges are not worthy of you, you don't trust life as a breeze and the men who make it that easy for you(normally because they're only after one thing). Woman is a being untested, a being of the middle.