Most Commented Politics Blogs (944)

I heard on the news this evening that Trump's disapproval rating is the lowest of any U.S. President in history, it is 63%, according to the " Pew Report." His campaign slogan has been changed, now it is :
MAKE AMERICA HATE AGAIN ! studecar

That's how I see it.
Make an unreasonable money demand on a group of people. To get the money, you create a situation where your actions financially affect hundreds of thousands of people until your extortion demands are met...
Hmm... That fits within the definition of terrorism.

Barack Obama Deported A Record Number Of Immigrants From The U.S. More Than Any Other President

Shawn Rice February 13, 2017
image:


During President Barack Obama’s terms, he had a record number of people deported from the United States which was more than any other president. As of 2015, more than 2.5 million undocumented people had been deported by immigration authorities since Obama took office in 2009. This total is record-setting. Take for example, during the two terms of his predecessor, President George W. Bush, removed just over 2 million people. This is interesting news considering controversy surrounding President Donald Trump's policies.

Note:

This is a thread on the forum and I thought it sparks a very good discussion.

So here how it goes. Currently it is of general notion to some that America is invading the middle east for greed. The people fight back and respond in terms of terrorism.

I researched and if it's true, then who are the first terrorists?

Read below and share me your opinions.

Second note : Not a single Muslim in middle east before 600, AD.


"The Ottoman Empire had been expanding into Europe ever since Constantinople fell to the Turks, and even before that. Wherever the Muslim armies went, they plundered cities, took slaves, turned churches into mosques, and converted many thousands of Christian captives to Islam at the point of a sword.

The Sultan’s armies overran Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, and Serbia. They turned Protestant Hungary into a compliant vassal and made war repeatedly on Austria and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Ottomans had designs on Vienna, since the fall of the city would open the way into the heart of Austria and the rich principalities of southern Germany.

The Turks besiege ViennaHaving failed to take Vienna in the siege of 1529, the Turks prepared a second attempt in 1683. Under the leadership of the Grand Vizier, Pasha Kara Mustafa, and with their Tatar and Malaysian allies, they made their preparations and fought their way towards the capital, overrunning Austrian villages and smaller cities in their path and taking many captives. As the Muslim hordes approached Vienna, King Leopold fled west with most of the citizens, leaving a garrison of about 11,000 soldiers and 5,000 citizen volunteers to hold the city against the Turks. The Viennese razed buildings in the area around the city walls in order to deny the enemy cover, and brought livestock and provender into the city to prepare for a siege.

On July 16th, 1683, the second siege of Vienna began. The tiny garrison in the city was no match for Kara Mustafa’s army of 140,000, but the Grand Vizier decided to starve the city into submission rather than attempt a frontal assault on its defenses."

From historical documents : Siege of Vienna.

A good friend of mine sent this to me and I am dreaming and I hope it will be a reality.


THE DONALD'S FIRST DAY IN OFFICE



1. President Donald Trump and Vice President
Marco Rubio are sworn into office.


2. In a rare event on inauguration day,
Congress convenes for an emergency meeting to repeal the illegal and
unconstitutional Socialist healthcare farce known as Obamacare. The new
Director of Health and Social Services Dr. Ben Carson announces that an
independent group of healthcare management professionals is hired to handle
healthcare services for poor and low income people. They are also assigned
the duty of eliminating Medicare and Medicaid fraud. Government's costs for
public healthcare are reduced by 90%. Healthcare insurance premiums for
working Americans are reduced by 50%. The move saves billions of taxpayer
paid dollars. Healthcare service in the U.S improves 100%.



3. Newly appointed Department of Homeland
Security Chief Ted Cruz announces the immediate deployment of troops to the
U.S. Mexico border to control illegal immigration and the immediate
deportation of illegals with criminal records or links to terrorist groups.
New bio-encrypted Social Security IDs are required by every American
citizen. Birthright is abolished. All immigration from countries that
represent a threat to the safety of American citizens is terminated
indefinitely. The move saves American taxpayers billions of dollars. Several
prisons are closed.



4. Newly appointed Secretary of Business and
Economic Development Carly Fiorina eliminates more than half of the
Government agencies operating under the Obama administration saving
taxpayers billions of dollars. Stocks rise 100%.



5. Newly appointed Director of Government
Finance Rand Paul announces the abolition of the IRS and displays a copy of
the new Federal Tax Return form. It consists of one page. The instructions
consist of two pages. The Federal Reserve is audited. The move saves
American Taxpayers billions of dollars and increases tax revenue.



6. Hillary Clinton is in prison, where she
belongs. Her cell is directly across from Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who
are serving time for "Hate Crimes." She bitches at them constantly from
behind the bars of her cell in what some call cruel and unusual punishment.

I'm just watching Sky news,
I find it very funny that the presenter has just asked Andrew MacKinlay if he though He should rethink his euroskeptic position because and I quote
"The leader of the free world has asked David Cameron to stay on side".

The reason I find this hilarious is
1. I dont ever remember voting for a Leader of a free world,
2. The very word Free would mean that having a Political leader imposed on me is the exact opposite of Freedom.

The Group of 7 (G7) is a group consisting of the finance ministers and central bank governors of seven major advanced economies as reported by the International Monetary Fund:

The group was organised prior to the 1973 Oil crises and perhaps is now all about Gas,
Russia is suspended rather than diplomatically involved.
And now I'm listening to Obama saying this is due to Violations with
the annex of Crimea.
Whereas China with all its human rights violations has often been involved in The group as a guest member,

Not to mention Obama's lack of interest in sanctioning Israel due to its violation of rights.







With oil running short and big business running around like headless chickens. one quick look at this information may help you see the kind of closed door politics we are being misinformed about.



I am also somewhat upset at The G7 being used as a platform to drum up support for war. even though I do under stand that war is part of big business and an industrial gold mine for certain nations.

Perhaps I'm wrong but isn't This the UN's roll to dictate.

"Due to the powers vested in its Charter and its unique international character, the United Nations can take action on the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century, such as peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism, humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality, governance, food production, and more."
UN.org

Maybe the UN is not falling into the line of big Industry the way they were hoping to so their political puppets are trying new avenues.

Have Politics and Business become their own Ba5tard Love Child

Keep the faith People

I came across this on Fox News.


Fox Guest: Rand Paul Must Prove He’d Nuke a Muslim Country if We Needed
by Andrew Kirell | 11:33 am, April 7th, 2015
387


On Monday morning, Fox & Friends held a lively debate between Brad and Dallas Woodhouse, the modern (and very much bloodless) political equivalent of Civil War “brother against brother” battles.

Brad is a Democratic consultant and the head of American Bridge PAC; Dallas is a Republican strategist and founder of Carolina Rising. The siblings once reached minor fame when they were interrupted by a phone call from their mother during their dramatic C-SPAN battle.

For their joint Monday morning Fox appearance, the pair debated this very Fox & Friendsian question: “Which GOP contender has the Democrats most afraid?” And when the subject turned to Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) — seen by GOP foreign policy hawks as too non-interventionist — here’s what Republican Woodhouse had to say:

sort of worldview may not be fitting the world as a lot of people see it right now. He’s got to prove — in my opinion, Rand Paul’s got to prove that he will nuke a Muslim country if we have to. I’m not saying we should. But I’m saying we will do that if it takes saving America and that there’s no doubt that he will do what it takes to protect America.
“Thank God you’re not running for president,” Democratic Woodhouse said in response.

The blog Crooks & Liars picked up on the clip and just when you’d expect the conservative Woodhouse to suggest the famously liberal website took him out of context, he followed up on Facebook with an affirmation of his views:

“Damn right I said it,” he declared. “I of course meant that Rand Paul has to win over the American (and republican primary) voters on national security. At its core the GOP is a National Security Party. Period. We are not the blame America first crowd. That is my brothers side, not mine.”

“We don’t like war, I don’t like war. We hate war,” he continued. “However we need a POTUS who will do WHATEVER it takes to protect America and her friends including Israel. I never want to see another Nuke used, but If We HAD to like in WW2 then so be it. I want a President willing to keep the option of Nuking the enemy on the table rather than letting THEM get the bomb to terrorize us and threaten and possibility destroy Israel as we know it.”

He concluded: “America First. Whatever it takes. No matter what.”

(Quick question from your humble writer: How does one *prove* you’d nuke a Muslim country? Just say it three times and it magically becomes so?)

Watch the original clip below, via Fox News:(don't know how to upload it or I would have, but you can go to Fox news and get it.)

This is not my choice, nor would I wish it to be, but given the fact that it is being talked about perhaps we should be aware? Now tell me, must we? Or must we not?

my personal view......religion and politics.....are the main base for the humankind......to survive (and live ) in the best manner...in this world....but....some of the worst devils...spoiling it.....what i mean is ...there is nothing best than .....religion and politics....for good peaceful life... just because of the devils...it should not be destroyed..

I do not like getting involved in the middle of politics because, in general, people will have opposing views. With our government becoming so divided between the right and the left, the idea of agreeing to disagree seems to be a thing of the past. With the divide so wide, one person cannot do a thing right because they are either a democrat or a republic...according to the opposing party supporter. I mean, who cares if their idea is good for the country...they are democrat (according to the Republican)....or they are a republican (according to the Democrat).

But, I got to doing some thinking. So, I am going to just share this thought here.

I was watching MSNBC (yes, known to be more on the democratic side of things) the other night. The Rachel Maddow show had an interesting segment about the latest Republican debate.

She started out by saying that some mysterious buyer bought the Nevada's largest newspaper, just days before the Republican debate, for a lot more than what it was worth. They bought it with cash and wanted to remain anonymous.

She went on by saying a very wealthy casino owner met with all of the Republican candidates just before the debate.

Then she said that the debate was held at this very wealthy casino owner's casino.

After that, they showed a video clip of the debate where a moderator asked Trump a question and started clapping when he give his answer.

Maddow then pointed out that was very strange how that moderator was clapping about Trump's answer.

Then Rachael mentioned it was reported that this elite rich casino owner was involved with buying the largest Nevada paper.

hmmmmm.

I am not the quickest thinking person out in the world because I had to take some time to put this all together and try to make sense of it. At least, make sense out of what I believe what MSNBC's Rachael Maddow was trying to say.

Donald is an astute hardened businessman. Boardroom bully and accomplished at tax avoidence. His business abilities cannot be disputed. Nor can his racism or his demeaming attitude towards women. Politics is a science and Diplomacy an art. Are his skills and faults transferable to American Presidency. Can a President deal with everything by making you an "offer you cant refuse". Would that resolve or cause conflicts. Im afraid. What do you think.