RE: will i run 5 miles again everyday?

It took me ages to psyche myself up to my 10K today. It was leisurely and low resistance, but at least I did it.

I don't want to lose the enjoyment of doing this. Everything feels like hard work at the moment and I need to feel positive about regaining my health and fitness.

RE: This Australian Speaks The Truth!

Perhaps they were capsules he was advertising at the beginning of the video to boost the immune system. My bad.

RE: This Australian Speaks The Truth!

I got a few minutes into the video.

Am I right in thinking he's promoting a pill implying it guarantees protection from a poor disease outcome?

And he doesn't understand how social distancing/wearing a mask reduces cross contamination for the benefit of everyone?

Nobody can completely isolate because at the very least we need food and other supplies. Medical staff and other essential workers put themselves and their families at risk every day. Medical care uses up resources.

Nobody likes social distancing and wearing a mask, but it's such a small ask in the interests of protecting others.

I've always had a good immune system and I was as fit as a butcher's dog before I became symptomatic at the beginning of April. I had it mildly, the primary symptoms lasting less than a week.

Four months on and I'm still fighting constant fatigue and trying to get my fitness back.

RE: will i run 5 miles again everyday?

I picked up a second hand exercise bike recently. I've lost fitness during the lockdown/post virus and I can get sunburn on a cloudy day, so it's ideal.

Up until now I've been inconsistent ranging from a good workout through to 'couldn't be bothered'.

I'm game for egging each other on to do a reasonable amount every day.

I did 10k yesterday and today.

RE: Should we think for ourselves?

laugh

No, it's rare that people piss me off, I feel comfortable enough to tell them and argue it out in public.

There is enough stuff on the internet for me to know that the prejudice filtering down to me is at least in part coming from David Icke, if not directly sourced from his conspiracy theories.

I actually feel a bit sorry for him as a human being. Whether he's an unwell man, an unhappy man, or both, he appears to be acting out a lot of personal pain.

There's just no excuse for manipulating others, creating pain for many and making a fortune in the process.

RE: Should we think for ourselves?

He's had events cancelled in the UK, Germany and Canada, books removed from sale, he's been investigated by Ofcom, had his visa to Australia revoked ahead of an event, publisher's refusing his work and he's had to self-publish.

He might not have done enough to be prosecuted, or there might not be enough proof for a prosecution, but individual institutions have blocked him on the grounds of objectionable, or unsubstantiated content which contravenes their codes of conduct.

Perhaps the whole reptilian thing, including his conviction that the Queen Mother was a lizard might make him difficult to prosecute.

Because you pissed me off.

RE: Should we think for ourselves?

Icke disseminates unfounded ideas and people like me cop the anti-Semitic fallout at work and in the street.

How many times have you said of your war experience that everyone integrated amicably until those who wanted power and money pit groups of people against each other?

Icke stirs the ethnic pot and profits handsomely from it, his net worth being £10 million.

Don't try to tell me he's any different from any other muppet who is feathering their own nest at the expense of others through the medium of bigotry.

RE: Should we think for ourselves?

Unlikely, as Icke is anti-Semitic and responsible for a lot of the hostility that I have to put up with.

I'm surprised you think Icke is a good source of information given he has this 'certain angle'. I thought you were above that sort of thing.

I'm dismayed that you have brought my name into the subject of your support of Icke, my friend.

RE: My dog

Am I supposed to be impressed at what a big man you are?

RE: Hiroshima, seventy five years on.

Why would it have prevented another world war?

I can see how it might have prevented nuclear weapons being used again, but that doesn't justify their use. They were weapons of mass destruction, so it was hardly surprising that there was mass destruction. The effects of radiation were also known, at least to some extent.

I may have missed this being mentioned already, but I heard (I can't remember the source) that the second bomb was dropped to compare the effects of uranium and plutonium bombs, not because it was needed to obtain a surrender.

I don't buy the argument that it ultimately saved lives either, given we can't know what might have happened if the bombs hadn't have been dropped.

I would, however, question whether these nuclear attacks were an experiment and/or war crimes.

RE: Hiroshima, seventy five years on.

I know you meant that as a comfort MissC and I really appreciate it, but it's just so wrong that so many people suffer the affects of war.

And for what purpose?

I really don't know how to answer Bodie's question because none of it should have happened in the first place to get to the point where the end was Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The only way it could be justifiable is through self-defence, but to annihilate so many civilians seems totally indefensible to me.

RE: Hiroshima, seventy five years on.

Oh, that's okay then.

The effects of non-nuclear war are insignificant.

I didn't know that.

RE: Dear ladies

laugh

RE: Hiroshima, seventy five years on.

thumbs up

The legacy of war goes on for many generations regardless of the mode of combat, or the types of atrocities committed.

I see behaviours in my daughter that I inherited from my mother's experiences as a child trying to survive WWII Germany.

I think of all the people around the world experiencing war and in refugee camps, their children, their children's children, those not yet born who will nonetheless be affected by conflict.

RE: A moment captured in time

It's pollution, Jim, but not as we know it.

RE: What makes men....more masculine ?

I can't think of anything gender specific which isn't superficial.

Traits like kindness, integrity, or humour make for a better man, but they make for a better woman, too.

Hairy chests are lovely, but some men can really work killer heels and false eyelashes.

I dunno, Pedro. dunno

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

Not by an stretch of the imagination, Spitz.

It's just something Tom does.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

Now we both know that's not true.

You have maligned me many a time when I've challenged your comments.

It's part of why I made a point of challenging you raising the subject of my ethnicity out of context. I have come to expect you to malign me.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

It's the way you tell'em, then?

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

I can answer that one!

It's just you.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

It did rather come from nowhere, I agree.

The phrase 'blind-sided' springs to mind.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

I'm not sensitive about being ethnically Jewish. Why would I be? dunno

I'm not so dense that I can't pick up on bigotry and challenge it, however.

Race, or ethnicity is irrelevant because pretty much everyone goes grocery shopping; hearing and sight impairment is not racially specific, either. I didn't think I'd ever have to explain that to a grown up.

I'd like to know why you mentioned that I am ethnically Jewish when you made a joke about my hearing and eyesight because it suggests some very odd cognitive processing.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

Then why make the comment:
What has my ethnicity got to do with my mask wearing experience?

Why did you put that irrelevant piece of information into your reply?

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

I have to disagree with you there, Spitz.

Senseless bigotry is the worst affliction by far.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

I think your internal organs are safe from us, Ches.

At least until the supermarket shelves are empty again.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

Don't talk to me about the whole masked grandmama retail experience. talk to hand

I tried a cloth one yesterday which blows out on every exhale and vacuum packs on my face every time I breath in. I felt like a diminutive, greying Darth Vader.

Because masks fit so close under my eyes and protrude further than my own facial profile, it reduces my field of vision. I was trying to follow the one way system in the supermarket, but searching for the intermittent, stylised, directional footprints on the floor required some bizarre postural antics to get the ground within my diminished scope.

Then there's reading glasses. I can't see where I'm going with them on, I can't find anything with them off. The moment I put them on they steam up. The on, off, on, off thing is bad enough without a mask, but it's like I've got some St.Vitus dance thing going on with a mask.

I did come to a solution, however. I put my glasses on the end of my masked nose (which incidentally had a permanent, quivering granny drip from the condensation) and that allowed the fog to clear. Now I'm nodding like the proverbial dog trying to see where I'm going, see the one way directions and see what's on the shelves.

All this is visual stuff is quite important to me because I'm sodding well deaf. I can't hear myself talking with a mask on, so I'm yelling through it, shrink wrapping myself with every deep inhale, mask blowing up like a balloon and glasses fogging up with every attempt at speech.

And I can't hear anyone else who is wearing a mask because I lip read...

But, if this saves lives, or saves others from having a horrible time of it, then we just have to adapt, find new ways of interacting with others and our surroundings and laugh at it all.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

Thanks Spitz.

I wonder if companies will be wary of employing over 50's who have lost their jobs now the idea has been vocalised, mind. Experience and skill might just have been outweighed by perceived financial risk.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

It's still 60 in Wales and prescriptions are still free for everyone.

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

So nothing has been said about over 50's being included in any future shielding, then.

Why did you suggest it has?

RE: News Elderly may be asked to stay at home under ministers' blueprint to avoid new lockdown

It doesn't say that in your op and you haven't posted a link with that information.

Not that I've just taken the first train to Huffsville about being called elderly, or anything, but I'd like to know what's happening and whether I'm looking at greater restrictions in the future.

This is a list of forum posts created by jac_the_gripper.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here