That's the kind of archaeology fanatics I was talking about!!!
Archaeology and anthropology are both circular reasoning religions full of blind dogma, with little regard for science when it contradicts their theories.
For instance, a woman found a site that was 25,000 years old in Mexico.
But she found it before the democratic education system of archaeologists of anthropologists were willing to accept science, so they destroyed her innocent life, and ruined her career, to save their careers.
Now a 50,000 year old anthropology site is accepted in Brazil.
Well...
Nowadays, scientists are teaching us that we don't exist in physical bodies.
They are teaching us that we are holograms.
Holograms don't have bones.
Holograms can appear to have bones; but holograms don't have bones.
Archaeologists and anthropologists who (just like the woman archaeologist who's career they ruined) are still trying to hold on to Darwin's outdated theory, for the sake of their reputations.
They aren't telling you that a growing percentage of our population knows...
We're holograms, and holograms don't have a fossil record.
Since you both are making the same mistakes by not understanding what I wrote because of your lack of comprehending punctuation marks, and inferring something I didn't say.
In what I wrote...
There was no period after the word, "exist; and an educated person should be able to understand that my sentence doesn't end until you get to the period, or some other punctuation mark.
Since I need to teach you both remedial reading skills to continue this conversation, it looks like this topic is over your heads...
Education and democracy are good examples of why archaeologists and anthropologists can't prove we exist in physical bodies, or that we should trust what we're taught about a fossil record
Anthropology is basically the study of man's bones.
Since biologists can't even prove we exist in physical bodies...
And, quantum physicists believe our whole reality is nothing but a hologram.
It takes a religious faith to believe we have a fossil record.
Because democracy and education have taught me that archaeologists can't be trusted to tell us the truth.
And what does The Bible say about the fact that biologists can't prove we exist in physical bodies, and quantum physicists are teaching us that we only exist as a hologram?
Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
I don't agree that there was no communication between those cultures.
The Mahabharata talks about vimanas, cars that flew wherever you wanted to go, without a pilot.
In the Oddesy gets home aboard a ship that sailed without oars or a pilot.
In the legend of Hiawatha which Longfellow plagerized, Hiawatha's canoe went where he wanted, without needing a paddle.
In the pyramids of Egypt and Mexico there was found scale models of planes, that fly when they're made to the same dimensions out of balsa wood.
Australian Aborigine//Melenisian/Polynesians are now believed to have inhabited the Americas continuously since 50,0000 years ago.
That's over twice as long as the people who arrived in the Siberian Land Bridge crossing about 23,000 years ago.
Homo Erectus is now believed to have built seaworthy rafts which they explored our globe with.
A boat lost off of Africa can accidentally sail to America in less than a month; and there were Africans sailing all over the place when the Sahara desert was underwater.
There are way more Clovis and pre-Clovis sites on the East coast of America, than on the West Coast... which supports a migration from Africa and/or Europe before the Siberian Land bridge opened.
The Piri Reis map supports earlier migrations too.
mykingdomforanam Forum Posts (3,244)
RE: Eat meat or not?
Lucky I live Hawaii.