Truth in Media, ISIS, and it's Origin
A very interesting topic that invites discussion for the political junkie like me.It is very clear that it is the poor judgment of the US to not continue on the cleaning up of the scum bags in the area. But let us go further, it is not like the current occupant of the White House was in support of eliminating these terrorists, now is it? It serves his agenda that US will be toppled down and therefore remove himself from the responsibility of finishing the job by keeping them in check. So yes it is the fault of the US for not monitoring the growth of these suckers but leaving it to thrive so that they create a powerful army of blood sucking terrorists.
At least that is what I understand from the video. Not like US created them directly and made all these scum bags to terrorize the world.
Question is how would it be undone and who benefits?
Elimination of ISIS, I mean.
Comments (39)
What's your idea? If I may ask?
If they keep attacking the world randomly like Paris, US, then let the people decide on a ballot.
As far as I am concerned it woul6have served the world better if yes, US did not meddle. It would have been a Muslim against another Muslim to kill each other, get it?
Its The truth
I Wont Shy Away from It
Donald Rumsfeld Said
Because Of The Plan Saddam Hussein Had To Asassinate George Bushs Father ( When His Father Was President)
The Plans Were Already In The Pipeline To Get At Saddam...Even Before The 2nd Bush Was Elected
Thats where It Really All Began
.....................................
I will give my belief on the power of God John that if it is what it is, then as the Greek says: Ondos, I guess. So be it. It is beyond our human hands and rational power to abate from happening. Poor humanity, we have to suffer because of our own doings. At least then, heaven is bound after all these squabbles.
Norman wanted to crush Hussein at first but wiser heads prevailed. Bush 1 never did like Cheney or Rumsfeld.
Kuwait was a major supplier of oil to the United States. The Iraqi takeover posed an immediate threat to neighboring Saudi Arabia, another major exporter of oil. If Saudi Arabia fell to Saddam, Iraq would control one-fifth of the world's oil supply. All eyes were on the White House, waiting for a response. President Bush, who succeeded President Reagan, stated simply: "This will not stand."
From google.
Unless Putin and Trump win the election, the CIA did a great service in Afghanistan.
You have to shift your thinking as to how Bin Laden became the enemy of the US after that. When Iraq war started then the Al Qaeda sided against the US and yes became our enemy hence the killing of Bin Laden.
Don't imply like these development becomes a manifestation of US bigotry and hypocrisy as you imply. There are times when a certain country is our ally only to become our enemy on another time.
"America Created Al-Qaeda..."
As the Forbes business information service article states:
"...[Osama bin Laden] received military and
financial assistance from the intelligence services
of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United States."
Do not confuse this with what happened subsequently.
That is a different matter.
The fact remains that America created Al-Qaeda.
Don't make a misleading point, like I said when Afghanistan was slaughtered by the Russians, we supported and trained them, they became our enemy in Iraq war. So the point contrary to your incomplete explanation is very misleading. As if we created an enemy for our own bigotry.
Isn't that your point?
I am not attempting to mislead anyone.
Stick to the substance of what I said.
The fact remains that America created Al-Qaeda.
That is my point in the matter.
Do not put words into my mouth.
Explain the substance. I feel you listened to the video you posted for me, you'd under no circumstance leave out the whole logic why.
I'm not arguing against your premise but justification is required so the truth is known. Don't act stupid.
However, I think you need a refresher lesson in Deductive Logic.
It requires 2 related premises from which a logical conclusion is drawn.
I made a single statement which I repeat for the third time:
The fact remains that America created Al-Qaeda.
That's all!
My brother was in Saudi on the first Desert storm, I have been working in and with the middle east since 1991 on and off
.The US was well prepared before any of you think in terms of protecting the "oil interests"..Saddam was an Allie..they betrayed him.
You can watch as much media as you want...but until you are on the ground, with the people..you all have opinions and views from what you are fed..none of you here are qualified to make statements about any middle east country until you have spoke, drank or lived with..iraqis..syrians...arabs in general.
The US does not want Arabs to unite..they want them to kill each other..they don't want a repeat of the oil crises back in the 70's..it cost the US billions !
If the US found a better source of oil..you will see them walk away from Saudi..and close the gate behind them.
Anyways I have just heard this saying in our of our meetings: "Take all the guns from the Middle East and there is peace in the wold, but you take away the guns from the Israelite and they will be all gone."
This has nothing to do with the post but I thought it might just be very interesting.