( sighs) been suggested a few times ... but, while he IS allowed out alone apparently he doesn't GO out on his own, or he does but it was complicated ...
'WW3 cannot strike' Lindsy ... it will have to be started.
It appears to me (my opinion only) that the USA are deliberately ramping up tensions and will later claim that their commencement of hostilities (bombing and nuclear or chemical weapons attacks) was an unfortunate "accident" ( such accidents have become common in recent years ) and they will expect the world to join them and then forgive them.
Both Russia and China have very deep 'spiritual traditions' (NOT to be confused with 'religion' where China does not participate) and their leaders have a very deep understanding of the consequences of war. They are naturally reticent to start wars.
Several years ago Mr Putin openly announced that Russia could not afford to compete militarily on conventional terms, so their effort was directed at electromagnetic defence systems. Those EMDS can also be used offensively.
IF nuclear weapons are used by the USA in North Korea then the 'drift' of contamination will certainly harm Russia and China and that harm will require a response. The US Military have for decades now been unconcerned about any response as it's always been 'over there' ie well away from US Territory.
I strongly suspect that the response from those nations will be to answer GW Bushes pleas to 'Bring it on ...' ie to 'take it to you on your own territory'
Interesting days in which we live ... may sanity prevail!
In a neat little town they called Belfast Apprentice to trade I was bound And many an hour sweet happiness Have I spent in that neat little town As sad misfortune came over me Which caused me to stray from the land Far away from me friends and relations betrayed by the black velvet band
Her eyes they shown like diamonds I thought her the queen of the land And her hair, it hung over her shoulder Tied up with a black velvet band
I took a stroll down broadway Meaning not long for to stay When who should I meet but this pretty fair maid come a-traipsing along the highway She was both fair and handsome Her neck, it was just like a swan And her hair, it hung over her shoulder Tied up with a black velvet band
Grins ... as I began to read I that was halfways expecting the end of the first to read 'I might fill you in' but thank heavens, you ended with 'that pic'
I'm absolutely NOT going to say looks don't matter, but I'm old enough (n ugly enough) by now to realise that looks are temporary while other traits are more lasting! Like, it's one thing to grow old together - a couple can still look at one another and each can see the earlier, younger more handsome one! But dating later we're probably gonna be meeting with equally wrinkly types... so IMHO have to look more deeply and see with different eyes (perspective?)
Pics, sure you take those at your best ... but please (not you personally - you wouldn't) don't insult people with pics taken after a half day makeover, a pro photographer and hours of photoshop
And yes, absolutely there has to be things 'in common' to want to progress things onto skype but that's a 'normal gradient' isn't ... like meeting someone in a real world social environment we might have several conversations before suggesting a personal meeting coffee / dinner date ? Too eager / too soon usually smacks of desperation?
Nope, not looking for a dag and sickly obese is unlikely to do it for me or most - as much as anything as there's so little possible in terms of 'going places and doing things' (though I gather there a section of guys 'chubby chasers' who consider the bigger the better ??? )
You're doing better then me ... I've found it's about 50 / 50 better looking ... and 5% all but unrecognisable from the pics!
Indeed no, and that's why we keep a spare in the trunk of the car!
Woah, THAT is a brilliant idea ...
Keep a spare woman in the trunk of the car, so if the original goes flat on you then you just bring out the spare and drop the other in the tyre shop to be plugged n patched !
Maybe it's just 'nostalgia' ... y'know that terrible human thing where we look back at the past and indulge ourselves for a moment by imagining things were different, better that they are now?
Mars bars ... were bigger and had real toffee on the top layer ?
Politicians were noble and honest ... OK I'm stretching it a bit there maybe!
But certainly people were (or seemed) to be more tolerant and accepting of one another ...
Or ... have I got it wrong ?
Yes, it IS a bit of a vague thread I intend for it to be ... so be sure to read it as " I'm asking, not telling" how it is in YOUR part of the world compared to 'yesteryears'
A Rebekah Beautiful girl who is amazing in school, very insecure, loves music, thinks she's forever alone and loves cheesy romance. Gets really annoyed when people call her Becky or misspell her name. Your name's Rebekah? Okay. R-E-B-E-C-C-A No. K-A-H. No C's in my name. #bekah#beautiful#smart#love#music
Bye now, or will you be calling in the rest of heavies
One might think perhaps of the late Princess Diana amongst many others as being 'posh'
But the origin of 'posh' was simply 'moneyed' and it expanded to include 'fashionable' as only the moneyed people could afford to buy fashionable clothes!
Terrorism is attacking the innocent and largely powerless in the hope of gaining some political advantage from those in power.
It fails because those in power generally have little regard for the people they govern.
In fact those who are govern suffer further indignities as those who govern take away their rights under the pretext that
"We have to have greater / more onerous powers in order to protect you, so you have to give up your rights"
There's a whole bunch of global government organisations with various 2 and 3 letter acronyms who undeniably sponsor terrorists and terrorism with money, arms, training and etc.
The sponsors and enablers of terrorism are just as responsible as the bombers.
There's also individuals / sections of those organisations who 'pollute the news'.
Once upon 'some groups in some countries' were labelled 'Freedom Fighters' ... not a term one ever sees nowadays!
But as well as the bombers those in power 'set examples'
It's known that those 'in the know' about 9/11 made millions by betting against United Airline stocks.
And now it turns out that the 'Truck Terrorist' in Germany was not allied to any 'terrorist group' ... he'd borrowed a five figure sum of money to make a bet against Dortmund (that their sticks would fall) on and after the days of his attack. It's not yet been calculated how much profit was made out of the attack.
So, we also have to consider 'financial terrorism' and realise that stock prices can be easily manipulated.
HexagonKeySet Forum Posts (3,829)
RE: I Don't Know, I'm kind of Frustrated.
No, I don't think he's a reincarnation of Norman Bates