The latest on the Mechanics of War
I was reading the latest news on the weapons of war and I am so flabbergasted on the capability when it comes to its power on destruction. But what bothers me most is why they even report it when in fact this should be as secretive as it should be?Anyways below is a report written by Jeffrey Lin and Peter Singer on Popular Science Magazine December 2014.
A most intriguing development on the world's crazy attempt to annihilate human beings.
HGV - unmanned hypersonic glide vehicle.
Countries testing them? China and US
Capabilities? Capable of traveling faster than 10X the speed of sound- MACH 25 or 16,000 miles per hour.
When is expected to be operational? 2019
"If weaponized HGVs could fly as far as intercontinental ballistic missiles (more than 3,500 miles) but strike with greater accuracy. Since the gliders don't fly in a predictable parabolic arc like ballistic missiles do, they would be exceedingly difficult to shoot down with traditional missile defenses. And their speed would make possible a whole new pace of war. For example, upon discovering the location of a terrorist leader in Syria, and HGV fired from US army base in Western Europe could hit the target in half an hour."
I am kind of like what is this world getting into? So we can be evaporized fast in the clouds?
And most importantly, please don't be caught suspected as a terrorist?
Thank you all for your reads and comments.
Comments (31)
Heaven help you if you write back because now you are a peson who two way communicates with X.
Maybe he (or she) writes back and sends a photo. Shades of Steganography. It doesn't mean anything they can't pick out the hidden message. Clearly they just lack the key, but with enough toe roasting and maybe some water boarding, someday someone will give them the code key, but for now the photo is evidence you two are planning something.. And so it goes.
Why make it secret? China working on it too. Who then would we be keeping it secret from? Our own people?
Shooting down missiles with other missiles is so yesterday. Negatively charged pulsed particle beams or terawatt lasers working at the speed of light would zap it. Why does it have to be launched? Why not just keep a bunch of them in orbit? Tell the world they are weather balloons or satellites. The media will buy that. Hmm, why stop there? Why not have some of them designed to knock out the other person's satellites? Going further, why not orbit the beam weapons? As the Earth turns, vaporize what is below..
For a REAL mind blower, search Dr. Judy Wood.
- Winston Churchill
decades, but we have not, because of one thing, mutually
assured destruction. The super powers hold this balance.
The deterrent is the Nuclear Submarine force that can be
parked off of your coastline without even knowing it.
That is why conflicts so far has been without Nukes.
I am thankful cooler heads prevailed.
Submarines contain a lot of metal. Pass that much metal through water and it will manifest it's presence as a disruption in the Earth's natural magnetic field. I wouldn't expect it to be too far fetched to speculate the big boys look for such disruptions in our oceans. Further speculation on my part would involve their looking at such records from a decade or three ago done over land, then comparing the changes found in last week's measurements and thereby fairly accurately pinpointing probable new underground installations that probably also have a lot of metal down there.
It's the weapons that are still 'top secret' that are the main worry... military technology is about 10 years ahead of what they actually tell us about....
....
Not enough women there soon. Their population will soon shrink big time. Maybe that was the plan all along?
How are we to clean up the gene pool and reduce societal decadence without a good war here and there?
The people of the future will be the worst Human Beings there ever was, they will make even us today look like Socrates and Mother Teresa.
I respect her, rather as a citation. But she was distracted for some reasons best known to her.
And my learned friend,.....to cut the story short. be it my beloved daughter.....my reaction would be the same....if not convinced?
I don't mean....if she, any way answerable, to any.....but questionable she is.
Am I wrong Mr. Ken?
Interesting blog....besides war, there are so many other things out there that could destroy our world...or what is on it.
I still take the standpoint, what can we do about it? At this moment, I do not think there is much we can do. So...I am going to focus my attention more on positive things.
But...it is always nice to have insight on the latest in the news.
Thanks. I hope we all see that this is not a joke anymore.
And I was a little bit carried away with my remorse for that criminal because of the media. But now I will repeat, I vote and support my judicial system in my country for the KILLING OF THOSE WHO COMMITTED CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AFTER A VERY SERIOUS AND COMPETENT JUDICIOUS PROCESS OF LITIGATION.
Thank you all for your reads. I will respond to all who took their time to comment on this very sensitive blog.
I like that, being focused on the positive side.
Thanks Johnny
SR