Last Viewed Blogs (62,520)

Listen To all The "Grownups" Will You
All going on any Blog That Even has a hint of The Word "SEX"
They Cant Wait To Play "Show and Tell"
They Cant Wait For Someone To tell "How They would Do It"
They Cant Wait To Say The Way They Would Prefer
Seems its The women Who By Far are The best at "Letting it all Hang Out"
And guess What Ladies(Well..I really cant say Ladies because "Ladies" Wouldnt be caught Talking The Way you Do) If you are looking For a "Gentleman"..They passed You By In a Flash With Disgust at The Words That Spews Out Of Your Mouth(And You wonder Why Youre alone)
And That Goes For Some of The "Idiot Guys" On here who Continually Say The same thing Over and Over Till They become The Biggest Bore... To The Point They are Making An Idiot out of Themselves(Say it Once hah?..And Then Shut up!)
Theres nothing Like letting The Whole World Know The "Real You"
And a Lot of You are Damned good at Doing That
So
Keeping To True Form That I Dont ask Questions
Ill Say This as a statement In The Form of A Question

"But Would You Want Your Children Reading What You Write Here?"...(Ah..That Might be A Different story Now)

Being not Part of "Your Crowd"..There should be a backlash At This "Outsider"(How dare he Speak To us In This Way!!!)
Thats Okay..Hit me with your best Shot!!..For That Matter....
................."Let It All Hang Out"........................

An Italian philosopher and statesman of the sixteenth century called Niccolo Machiavelli defines the word Machiavellianism. His best-known writings include a set of suggestions for obtaining and maintaining governmental power. Machiavelli has come to be associated with the use of opportunism in interpersonal relationships. Therefore, Machiavellianism is defined as the use of your power to make other people believe or do act in their own interest but giving you the benefit of their actions.

have you noticed how many people surround you with this system?

A Bf ? A GF? Wife ? Husband ?

I'm quite happy with my life at the moment, done my share of breaking hearts so I'm trying to live a quiet life now. Waiting for someone special but might be tempted to go on a date one of these days., when life gets too boring you know

All these bickering here on blogs, political arguments, name -calling are about to crash this dating site so might be a good idea to put more effort in finding someone special here while this site is still here

Old news I know, but not for me.

In a room in Dublin, a man nicknamed "Dr Death" is teaching people how to die. A dozen people are here to plan their suicides.

On a screen, poisonous substances are ranked in order of convenience, availability and painfulness.

Dr Death sits at the front of the room, not facing directly at his audience - almost as if it's too hard to look them in the eye. But they clearly have no inhibitions about being there.

One woman says she has traveled from Singapore for this. The audience is made up mainly of elderly people - many have seen friends and family die in horrific ways.

Their host promises an answer for their desperation. In vivid detail, he describes how their final moments could offer something different. It sounds too good to be true.

Apparently the substance leaves no trace of it in the body after death.

I never knew such a service existed.

Is this a good or bad choice?

Maybe I'm a coward but I strongly believe, while there's life there's hope.

Last year I visited India and met one of my business friend.
suddenly I saw in his money bag left side have a big women's picture and ask him whose she, he told his wife. I asked if you love too much your wife so why keep her picture in Money bag it should be your side of Heart, He answered very strongly , its not that,when any big problem comes to sheikh with me I open this picture and my all problem make solve then I ask how can?? He told all problem I forget when I saw this Problem (wife's picture) in my moneybag, Hi all of---- really is it...???

Joe was a steward for Fly High airlines. He watched as an older lady boarded the plane holding a dog in a cage. “Excuse me,” said Joe “dogs are not allowed on board, you have to check it in with the baggage.” The lady wasn’t happy, but Joe was an experienced steward and succeeded in convincing the lady without much of a scene. Upon arrival, Joe took a peek in the cage, and to his great surprise, saw that the dog was dead! Frantic that they may get sued, Joe quickly sent one of his underlings out to town to buy a dog that looked exactly the same. Just in the nick of time the underling arrived with the dog They quickly switched dogs and breathed a sigh of relief. “This isn’t my dog!” said the lady as soon as she saw it. “I’m sure it is” insisted Joe “I was very careful about where I put it.” “It’s not my dog” argued the lady, “you see, I was bringing my dog to my home town to have him buried, and this dog is alive!”

Larry was a photographer for the N.Y. Times, and was scheduled to meet a plane on the runway to take him on a job. “Hit it,” said Larry climbing into the first plane he saw on the runway. The pilot took off, and was soon in the air. “OK,” said Larry, “fly low over the trees over there, I want to take a few pictures.” “What do you mean?” asked the pilot. Larry looked at the pilot and answered a little annoyed, “I need to take some pictures for the N.Y. Times, so please…..” There was a long pause, before the pilot asked in a shaky voice, “you mean you’re not my pilot instructor?”

If flying is so safe, why do they call the airport the terminal?





Have a great week!

Happy Birthday to a very nice lady!

May you have many, many more! Enjoy your SPECIAL DAY!

This is a complicated subject and I'm having trouble wrapping my head around it.

US presidents definitely have a certain amount of legal immunity whilst carrying out the duties of their office and for good reason: if every Tom, d*ck and Harry were allowed to file civil suits against the president every time they disagreed with a statement, or decision, the president would not only be inhibited from free speech in the form of discussion and debate, but would soon be too bogged down with legal challenges to carry out their presidential duties.

Having said that, Article II, Section 4 provides: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The very existence of the impeachment provision surely means that presidential immunity is not absolute.

However, there appears to be some contention about when a president is and is not liable in criminal, or civil settings depending upon the action, the time of the action, statute of limitations, etc. Presidential immunty is relevant with respect to the civil and criminal cases currently faced by Donald Trump.

A civil suit was brought against Trump in 2021 by two police officers and about a dozen members of congress seeking damages for injury sustained during the January 6th breach of the Capitol. An appellate court consisting of a three judge panel has just unanimously ruled that Trump can be held civilly liable.

The ruling asserts that "The sole issue before us is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints."

With this statement the appellate judges have bypassed any issue of actual liability, but have stated their ruling is only about the extent of presidential immunity.

The ruling went on to say, "We answer no, at least at this stage of proceedings." This means that their decision can be appealed, but if upheld these particular complainants may continue with their civil suit against Trump.

The appellate judges argued in their ruling, "When a first term president opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an offical presidential act. The Office of the Presidency as an institution is agnostic about who will occupy it next. And campaigning to gain that office is not an official act of that office."

This ruling perhaps has wider implications with respect to Trump's other suits, namely his criminal indictments in Washinton DC where he stands accused of conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presdential election. Trump's defense currently centers upon his presidential immunity, but if his actions are deemed a part of his campaign, that defense becomes moot.

Once upon a time, there was a lazy cat named Whiskers. Whiskers lived a comfortable life, spending most of his days lounging in the sun, napping, and grooming himself. He didn't like to do anything that required much effort, such as hunting for his food or playing with toys.

One day, a mouse sneaked into the house and started stealing Whiskers' food. At first, Whiskers was too lazy to do anything about it, but as the mouse continued to take more and more of his food, Whiskers realized he needed to take action.

He thought about all the ways he could get rid of the mouse, but they all required too much effort. Finally, he came up with a plan that was just lazy enough for him. He started napping in front of the mouse's hiding spot, making it difficult for the mouse to get to the food.

The mouse soon realized it couldn't get to the food with Whiskers in the way and gave up trying. Whiskers was pleased with his clever solution and went back to lounging in the sun, happy to have solved his problem in the laziest way possible.

From that day on, Whiskers had plenty of food and no mouse to bother him, and he lived the rest of his days in lazy contentment.