@OP well you managed to get over your infatuation with the perfect girl. Perhaps America too will get over their similar infatuation (positive or negative) with POTUS45 - but the damage has been done and continues.
No way is he one of you! He is one of HIM. Think about the poor sods who lost out in his many bankruptcies - he lost nothing but they got next to nothing.
@OP many comments, and also threads have disappeared of late. It happens. You have already been told that is the case. Your deleted posting was inoffensive, and to have deleted it seems to make no sense. Why not make such a generous assumption instead of the more negative one you have made and have fulminated about here? As the idiom goes: 'dont get (your knickers in a knot/all bitter and twisted)'
60 dismissed cases, and many many many Republican voices confirming he had lost. Beyond reasonable doubt he knew it and that should be enough, unless he cares to claim cognitive problems. Perhaps too the evidence in this case will bring some of the delusional American public to their senses. Stolen Election? Idiots!
@grand Well of course I do not take you seriously, but I do indeed think carefully and take pain to express what I think likewise. I repeat: the reputation of US globally has fallen mightily, going back to the Bush Jnr era and even earlier with the various and continuing middle east misadventures. But it has plummeted since Trump took over, reneging on various agreements. With a quieter calmer period of an uninspired Biden there is a levelling out, the world does not expect brilliance, yet there is a sense of relief.
The so-called co-conspirators are unnamed, and uncharged, at least not in this indictment It is worthwhile recalling that Powell used as a defence 'no rational person could take my words seriously' referring to the claims of stolen votes
@opThe fact is that America has been greatest for almost 150 years - no dispute! Yet they have mightily diminished their worldwide respect in this century, and the MAGA campaign continues and accelerates the downslide. You guys have no idea what damage has been done to your reputation and how the respect dwindles.
@plumOh sure you have! You found it on ther internet perchance, or some American deep-throat emailed it to you? But your delusional idiocy is matched or exceeded by perhaps millions of equally gullible Americans. Strange strange indeed that the likes of @plum @chance @super and @ozzie should share such absurd beliefs! But there you go (no accounting for human thought - one at least born every minute, and Trump takes advantage of it) from your own 'mouths'!
@op On the face of it, all that makes her admirably qualified to hear the case against Trump. Note that her previous finding against Trump was upheld on appeal, whereas the Trump appointed Florida judge's favourable finding was overturned on appeal. Trumps railing against judges seems to be based on whether he thinks he 'has them in his pocket' wouldn't you agree? Nothing you have said indicates any association of Chutkan with with Biden Jnr or Ukraine Energy. Nor was it the law firm itself that lobbied for Burisma, rather it was the lobbying company Blue Star Strategies. You like to deviate into shady semi-truth don't you?
Attacks by Trump on Judges appointed to hear his cases - he commonly makes claims of Clinton appointment bias and so on. Interesting tactic to claim the justice system is so politically biased, perhaps he is doing so planning to lodge time-wasting appeals based on unfairness.
@op Your words or a quote? To be verbally attacked by Trump as all have been and have no recourse except tp maintain integrity must of course rankle, but that is the Trump intention perhaps, hoping thereby to push them to exceed judicial impartiality.
@chancer That is an absurd and libellous assertion. Judges do not make such partisan decisions. You are swallowing Trump's claims of bias and letting them colour your thinking.
@10-of @Lou did not ask for proof, the @op merely stated that she had. She had not. The @op certainly provided no proof in the first place anyway, mere speculation.
Given the lunar period is about 29.53 days, the chance of two full moons in a 31 day month is approx 1.47/31 or about 1/21 (full moon on the first day of the month). In fact in China today, being the day of full moon, it is Aug 1st, so we can increase the odds perhaps to 2.47/31 or about 1/13 somewhere in the world where it wasx 31-July. There are seven 31-day months in a year so once in every 2-3 years is about right. They say it happens twice in August, so it must also have happened twice in July in another part of the earth.
You know almost none of those assertions. You simply state or guess or speculate or hope there might be some truth in them. Never having been introduced to or informed by the parent (the mother) hard to see how it is joyous. Your inserted words are they? And admit is a loaded word, is it not, suggesting concealment or explicit denial, and perhaps no knowledge either. There was no concealment. There has been zero proof to date, so more proof is pretty specious. Nothing you have reported or repeated here so far has any ring of credible truth, let alone proof. Repetition is not proof.
Musk is only one of the world's wealthiest men because his wealth is measured by his Tesla share price - which with a PE ratio 75 is grosssssssssssssssssssly over-rated. Compare with Mazda at 7 and Toyota at 12 both with far higher production.
responding to a 'like you' is just a mistake to start with. If they cannot be bothered with a message, I cannot be bothered responding. Should they also send a 'Hi how are you? I like your profile' message, same treatment. There should be some clue in their profile as to why they might like you. If not, buzz off. Supposing there is (very rarely) a detailed message with an immediate request to whatsapp or wechat or skype, forget it. If you can however have an interchange here, you might progress to another app, but there has to be voice, and soon visual contact, else forget it. To date, 3+ years, I have made one or two contacts in Wechat/Whatsapp/Skype - probably genuine, but have never seen or heard them, so forget it.
why on earth would you smash the front windscreen? side window, reach in and extract the keys or the baby - in some cars the doors cannot be opened without driver release of childproof locks... who knows maybe they had smashed a side window and couldn't get in.
Why would one address claims made without a shred of evidence. Should I happen to claim you are on the take from Ritter because you promote his youtube, would you sugeest that be investigated too? There is no way we have to pursue this stuff. But if it is not credible and is unsupported we should probably dismiss it, don't you think? Why did you think it was credible and worthy of passing on as you have?
Talking about not having guns, we don't have 380 plus mass shootings in schools, churches, gay bars concerts and the like either. Oh poor benighted Aussies! Slaves to commonsense. These are the evidence of American democracy and freedom I guess. Also 4 times the covid death rate in Australia, the right to refuse rebel and reject vaccine, I suppose. A million plus of you have died so far celebrating that glorious right. Do you wear a seat belt perchance? Shuck it off, an infringement on god-given right surely!
Doesn't feel in the least vital to me! Has all the hallmarks of biased conspiracy theory beat-up. Just another media invented issue to encourage polarised America to distance further and oppose even louder. But for the flagrant lies and incitation to revolt I do indeed hope potus45 gets his come-uppance. With 300m+ guns, there could yet be one helluva OK corral!
macaron is meringue based ... haven't had one since childhood, but I see them in photos my daughter sends me from French pâtisseries. (I can type ñ and â - alt-0241 and alt-0226, but not ó)
@op are you asserting that everything Ritter claims about Zelenskiy, without evidence, is factual? Highly dubious. Totally unsubstantiated. There is prison history for underage sex offences, and suggestion of Russian 'honey-potting' and a Russian wife. Of course I am not claiming these in themselves are evidence of lies, but what he says is scarcely evidence either.
RE: A thin line
'Clueless' I certainly am not. Nor 'gormless' for that matter - that is a cap you wear with distinction.