Back when Darwin was alive, natural selection was only considered a theory. Nowadays it's a forgone conclusion by anyone who understands it, It's extremely subtle at most moments, but over a huge period of time, it is often quite additive and appears dramatic.
That's extremely significant and AFTER the Delta variant took hold. It will likely get even better when the vaccines are updated to include antigens (or mRNA coding for antigens) to the newer variants, including Delta.
The bottom line is that embracing political agenda over science has literally been killing people. Hopefully, at least some of the survivors will learn from this data to embrace science, especially when it comes to one's health, which is very important.
It had nothing to do with arrogance. It had to do with the fact that I neglected to include the close quote command in the original comment. I did include it in the second post, which was exactly the same, except for that close quote command. Of course, you deleted the latter corrected one, instead of the original. No big deal to me though.
Even NEWSMAX debunked Robinson's claims OVER A WEEK AGO !!
Right-wing media outlet Newsmax had no choice on Tuesday but to issue two statements. One came from Elliot Jacobson, Newsmax’s executive vice president and chief content officer: Newsmax is a strong proponent that Covid 19 vaccines are overarchingly safe and effective. while at the same time raising concerns that mandates infringe on personal liberty and privacy. We have seen no evidence to suggest LUCIFERASE or LUCIFERIN are present in any vaccines or that they are used as any sort bioluminescent marker. And here’s the other, from parent company Newsmax Media:
Newsmax strongly believes and has reported that the Covid 19 vaccines are safe and effective. We do not believe the vaccines contain any toxic materials or tracking markers, and such false claims have never been reported on Newsmax. The many medical experts appearing on Newsmax have supported the use of the vaccine.
Their concept is so easily debunked, it's literally ridiculous. If it were true, the vaccinated would be emitting light in the dark. But, we don't. Even if we did, it would be a very poor tracking medium. Our skin isn't transparent and we would compete with fireflies. Plus, how would you be able to tell one individual from another.
People who can't accept reality rarely feel well for long. So, they do everything in their power to deny or draw attention away from reality. But, it's a failed effort, as reality eventually ends up biting them hard. So, they take it out on others, especially when the others are right.
A lot less people would realize how stupid Trump is, if he would keep his mouth shut. However, he continually makes the determination easy. Being loud, brash, corrupt and stupid is not a good combination. But, he is, who he is, That's why his attorneys will not allow him to testify without it being written by his attorneys.
g - you didn't need cable to watch the World Series. It was on network TV, FOX to be exact. You probably could have got it with a digital antenna, which are a one time small expense.
Mathematically, the odds are MUCH lower, if you look at it from a different angle. "Soulmate" assumes, that there is only one of THE ONE. Think how many people there are in the world and only one of those is your "soulmate". What would be the odds that person would even be on CS, let alone respond to you ?
The odds are much greater that your soulmate in not on CS, since most of the world is not.
It's certainly up to the individual, as to whether to post a photo or not. It's up to the site, as to what are the rules regarding that photo.
I like having a photo of myself, because it rapidly identifies my blogs to the readers as belonging to me with just a glance.
While I can certainly understand the reasons you choose not to post a photo, if a motive for being on this site includes dating, you would likely attract more candidates with a photo of yourself. However, that is somewhat less important, if you are the person who initiates contact.
Because species evolve to exploit a niche. The environment is not universal on Earth. It's not even universal in the same forest. Plus, the environment changes over time. In addition there is genetic diversity not limited to differences between species, but even within the same species.
I don't care about that. I just don't want people waiting for me in person to come outside and follow me around everywhere I go. I'd never be able to take any nature photos, or enjoy my life other ways.
JimNastics Blog Comments (11,843)
Genetically, Only a Small Percentage of Humans is Uniquely Human
Back when Darwin was alive, natural selection was only considered a theory.Nowadays it's a forgone conclusion by anyone who understands it,
It's extremely subtle at most moments, but over a huge period of time, it is often quite additive
and appears dramatic.