But I'm not suggesting that what remains of our dwindling posterity should rise up and seize the state in a coup. Largely because they won't. A young person in an aging society isn't a free spirit. Things that would be common knowledge to a younger population are not common knowledge to young people in an aging society. Even the young men think and behave like old women because you cannot divorce the individual from the society in which he lives. Being young doesn't make an individual right, what I'm saying is that a young society would be less wrong. Common knowledge itself would be relevant to this day and age rather than the past. These 21 year olds sleeping upside down from a meat hook do that because of the way society is in general. They fear growing old and they fear covid not because this is reasonable for them to fear these things, but because they are influenced. They inherit the fears of society in general and in this way each and every young man is an old woman.
And to sustain a left-wing ideal the society would have to become like Logan's Run. You're born a young adult, get to live as one for thirty years, and then the state executes you.
But that's not what happened and it wouldn't happen without being forced into it. The society is the opposite of Logan's Run; an aging population that terminates the under 30. A ruling class that grew up in a world so completely different to today that it makes any conclusion it draws almost bound to be wrong. The internet would never have even got started if it had not been born outside of society's control. Stillborn would be my description of the 21st century, the future of youth and old age security are at complete loggerheads and I think we know who's winning.
Put eternal life down as another one of those self-terminating left-wing ideals that renders every nation in which this mentality has broken through the end of the line, the end of history. The irony of these new ways that render all things a sinister old fossil like Simon Cowell and his Scooby Doo villain plastic face.
Anyway at least we are men so that it matters less to grow old and then die. The longevity of her indoors is a dull and miserable condition, it's been proven. Imagine you begin perfect and the whole point of life was merely to stave off decay. Imagine a life of pure self-preservation where nothing can be done? It's not a life to envy at all.
If we discover the key to eternal life then it's soul death we need to worry about. We would need to find a way to forget forever everything that happened in the past, because everything's better when you were a kid.
Consider the subjective agony that is today where we can afford to eat out twice a month when previously this was every week. What does being the second most privileged people ever to have lived mean to those who used to be the most privileged people ever to have lived? It means that the world's all wrong, a million times wrong.
I can think of more reason why people grow old and pass away than I can for the animals. Animals forget don't they, each day is effectively a new day when you're a dog, a million year old dog wouldn't spend all day trying to kill itself like we would. An aging population of humanity will in weariness and disgust of life kill everyone around it and eventually itself.
Yea, I think he's unraveling to be honest. There is no glory in killing anyone, all the moreso when it's like shooting fish in a barrel. The bell tolls for thee
A girl who used to be fat has the inner and outer beauty, but the other woman you could look in the back of the head. It depends how long this hypothetical romance is
A girl who used to be fat has the inner and outer beauty, but the other woman you could look in the back of the head. It depends how long this hypothetical romance is
You could try asking an intellectual but I think it's the women who win the indifference awards. Less skin in the game to begin with, ambition is not a positive thing for equality it is when justice and whatever you wanted to happen become basically the same thing.
There are people who have power and the people who don't, there are the popular and the people who are not popular. You cannot win an argument just by being right, so much more than right or wrong decides whether a person is right or wrong.
And I think the best we can do is non-judgementalism. Equality is an inaction a sense of restraint. The question that asks, what if im wrong? It's still no guarantee of equality, but genuine humility is inequality limited.
And the reason we spend so much on housing and Mercedes for telesales is cheap and easy borrowing. And also not being able to do maths and to some extent the English language. Half the world speaks our language which may seem like a bonus but in reality it places all native English speakers at an intellectual disadvantage.
Well, we're going to have to put more money aside for food and fuel at the expense of house prices, rent and people who work in telesales driving a Mercedes Benz. It's the latter three which consume the overwhelming share of wages, food had actually never been cheaper but it's about time our fake middle class country learns a sense of priority. You know what is a middle class value? Thrift. It is not paying through the roof for your stinking slums nor is it driving a Mercedes when you work in telesales.
Any so long as I'm actually dead before they scoop it out. I've had quite enough of live organ donation throughout the pandemic, lockdown was eerily close to shortening life for the young and healthy significantly to provide a slight extension to somebody else.
At least one positive of being less than equal is the familiarity with and resolve in the face of, rejection. You get to decide what you want then instead of having your mind up by the things you couldn't have. All the extra work is best not to think about as work, but freedom really. It's a liberation to be rejected most of the time
And I do believe that one of the reasons, perhaps the main reason, that first world anxiety is greatest in America is because the house has a staff. Britain and Europe are too socialistic, or should I say opposed to aristocracy, to literally have a domestic servant. A domestic servant class is a bit like a mail order bride, on the surface it seems like a good deal but really it's building the reason why you'll never have any friends or a woman who loves you, your kids won't want to see you and this loveless relation begins by not cleaning your own toilet.
The frenemy is another example of the dangers of the more than equal. Privilege will mean that your friends are like women's friends, which is to say not really your friend. The enormous suspicion that exists amongst the great untested because you'll never know them and they'll never know you, neither will know what itself or the other is capable of the great untested is not in reality a society on good terms. The first world will die of anxiety and being suspicious of everyone it meets long before any sort of real trauma.
I suppose you have to draw comfort from the fact that whatever your lot in life is you are going to get used to it. It is the privileged who will become cool as AIDS actually more easily upset than the person living with HIV. Ain't that strange? Getting used to privilege is a constant source of disappointment but getting used to hardship is in its own way a blessing. That's the paradox how the less than equal are in fact much better company than those who never had it so good.
I sometimes think of myself as kinda like the last curious man. You know how the internet has made everything a lot more like high school with a site for goths, a site for chads, a site for this type of person and no other, well I never did like that about high school. For all the possibility of mixture what you actually get is an intensification of the same people with the same people and I always hated that. Always thought that random was brilliant in its own way even if it's not the done thing anymore. I love that something could happen by chance because I'm a weirdo.
And it would be a twisted take on human rights anyway. To spend good money on Twitter police who guard the first worlder from his most sensitive and trivial of concerns in a world where some people have to walk miles to the nearest infected water? That's not human rights, it's superior rights for first world weaklords.
It's the lower class men going to the dogs but the nobel prize for physics goes to those three chaps.
And if they bring in equal Nobel prizes for all this wouldn't actually change much men and women in the working class. No, it would be taking the prize away from better male scientists and giving it to a worse female scientist so that all of humanity loses apart from elite women. And maybe not even those if all of humanity loses. Perhaps the better way of putting it is that elite women would lose least by equal noble prizes for all.
And the reason working class women have faired comparatively well are obvious. Becoming a mother meant they always had at least one way of doing something with their life. Men didn't have this when the mill closed down. And then there's an aging population. What man is going to go around cutting old people toe nails for a living? Useful things the working class can still do are much more amiable to the woman.
And so we have this divide between the haves and the have yachts where the degenerated gender switches around. The have yachts are justified by the achievements of the men, and the haves justified by the contributions of the women.
It is often the company you keep, the influences around you. I'd seen no evidence for telepathy until I became surrounded by pathetic lowlives with boring lives
Fundamentally harmless moron. I don't know fully know but I think the worst sort of person wouldn't be here even if there is a large amount of putting your worst foot forward. On the one hand nobody has to look anybody in the eye and it's grimly predictable how that works out, but on the other hand it's people who are just lonely and want somebody to talk to. The inhuman monster wouldn't be drawn here, it's human to be here, so not so much a bad person, but a moron.
For me there's only really David Bowie, it really bothered me when he died and I've never felt that before or since. Now what did Bowie do to attract fans? Criticise everything that a fanatic was, take the piss out of his fans for having no mind of their own. If everyone was like Bowie the left would actually work. He's a starman waiting in the sky above and beyond the rest of us, but not in an annoying way
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Why do we age?
But I'm not suggesting that what remains of our dwindling posterity should rise up and seize the state in a coup. Largely because they won't. A young person in an aging society isn't a free spirit. Things that would be common knowledge to a younger population are not common knowledge to young people in an aging society. Even the young men think and behave like old women because you cannot divorce the individual from the society in which he lives. Being young doesn't make an individual right, what I'm saying is that a young society would be less wrong. Common knowledge itself would be relevant to this day and age rather than the past. These 21 year olds sleeping upside down from a meat hook do that because of the way society is in general. They fear growing old and they fear covid not because this is reasonable for them to fear these things, but because they are influenced. They inherit the fears of society in general and in this way each and every young man is an old woman.