to kill is against human law is it not?
Then why on earth do we allow religion in our realms that incite to murder us all?Now you'd say they're only fanatics yet we see hundreds if not thousands of them trained to do just that.
Again I'm not here to say that all muslims are killers not at all.
I do know for a fact that there are good ones yet out of 1.3 billion and 3 percent of them visibly out to carry that provision, what guarantee do I have that this number doesn't get to a point where all of them will wake up and become a true follower and do as incited and ordered?
Note : San Bernardino is an example of those that have underestimated such notion.
Comments (42)
This is where the conflict comes from. When it comes down to what truly is right then why not change that provision?
Back to the student that was arrested, he was attending university, and one day, out of the blue he woke up , and decided he was going to go join isis. What got into his head to make him want to do this, is this going to become common practise among some people. I know its not proper to judge a whole group of people on the actions of a few, but you can t tell that to those poor people killed in Paris, and Brussels.
You're looking hot tonight
Funny that you mention a figure of 3%,
I was only reading an article claiming that in or about that same number of the worlds population are sociopaths .
If this is true then any demographic you choose will fall into this quagmire..
heres an example;
Was going to post Fifth Estate news coverage on Trump...he certainly is an entertainer...imagine that he gets elected...another kind of extremism...
Lind
Before you go bashing a religion...check out what Eleg stated...she makes sense...but I suspect your too far gone...
these are from the old testament before Christ came to earth to teach GOD's law to the people. read the new testament. hope this will help.
Enumerating the flaw of this religion doesn't make my question irrelevant to the effect of the fact that 3 percent of a very big group, does follow.
If again, I will repeat, if any of these are currently used to harm you or anyone, I would be just as staunch in standing up against their acts.
New testament Cruelty.
PS I don't like Sam Harris
I believe that my question is a very legitimate one that deems serious thinking. Even a grade one or juvenile can get to the point. If you were young and your mother would have told you to go and kill those that don'e believe in what he believes in, how different is that to what I am asking?
So now one would say, in this case Elagsabiff, no sane mind will have to to that. Exactly so then should we ignore the 3 percent that gets to be loyal to this religion? Like I said, the number of the largest standing army in the World in this case China, followed by US is clearly outnumbered by these killers.
What is so wrong in accepting the fact that the provision on this stupid book does advocate killing which none in the other religions are doing now and then. If there were, like I said, I would have been just as vocal as question their motivation relative to humanity and our right to live in peace.
You made me laugh my pal. First because it does point out two things, how many people are truly sick and the other most important thing is how effective is our US way of identifying them.
Now granting that these sociopaths are all with the same level of deliberately killing us, imagine the result.
If the killers in Belgium were muslims born and raised there much the same way as San Bernardino then the more we have the right to shut them off so we can concentrate on profiling and checking out those born here, who obviously didn't integrate and mostly sociopaths according to Non's tape. Those that are posing as angels in wolves skin.
Now on your point, if that is the law so be it. For now I don't take him any less capable to be my president because of this issue.
For purposes of clarification, please provide me an act based on any of these that are prevalent and being used? Wheww Non, what a notion, and like Elle mentioned not all of us will have no brain to follow such stupid provisions, but this is beyond my question Non.
Stick with my Human law will you? Is there any of these laws that are religion based and specifically enforced to violate any human laws?
Good point...have you seen the discussion Bill Maher had regarding Trump?...basically Trump is more than infatuated with himself...he uses whatever means to win...the truth is irrelevant to him...a demagogue...
I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.
You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason people do not like him is because:
(1) he is antithetical to the “good old boy” method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians;
(2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a candidate speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who own them vis-à-vis donations;
(3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology; and
(4) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.
Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to “out crazy” one another. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.
We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?
People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common amongst those who have never accomplished anything in their lives, and who have always played it safe not willing to risk failure.
These and many more that comes to mind. Most specifically our immigration policy. It is inherent for us to protect our borders. Period. It is against the law to illegally allow migrants.
The acute need of protection of our country, I love his design and his goal.
Now on the one hand if I think of it beyond religious credible prophecy, then I am losing all my human free will of using my choices based on what I think. Since my perception and my belief and my level of understanding of understanding are all gift, then I am going to take up all the responsibility of my mistake or for that matter, supplying the force to make a prophecy. For right now I am fit to think for myself and would say not doped or fooled to that effect.
Thanks my dear H for that addition.
And I didn't realize that predictions ie: (the future) were fact based....
Let us ignore them. They see black and we see white. No point in arguing as they will never understand where our position is. I can guarantee you, though, that if they will directly reap these crimes and be the victims, they still probably will smile and do nothing. Now that is the true enemy of this world.
It is of no use to try to give your opinion or try to educate some here...Trump is Linds god...lol...
I understand your point of view...and so do many others...
Obama fooled me from believing into his lies. None of those things he said had ever come into what I expected and look at Hilary, it just makes me cringe to my stomach. If you can divorce a man you love because of change that are not quite resulting to harmonious relations then change.
I can't condone bad things that are committed in front of me and I have the right to choose who can best serve my interest. Having said that, thanks and I respect your opinion, now leave it as that.
Thanks all.
Thanks again, I really enjoyed that.