Chav, inbetweener and toff. And now the chavs want to adopt the same anti-immigrant practices as the inbetweeners which is the essence of Brexit, the Teachers Union and other professional unions keep out foreigners and the big money exists between a small number of the well-connected who retain most of the wealth in a circle of who you know. To make work pay the lower classes want to raise the cost of a fitted kitchen in the same way inbetweening remainers raise the cost of teaching kids to read.
Sending mails doesn’t qualify as making the first move and nothing done online has ever required balls of steel.
To say that a woman not making the first allows the man to show what a man he is is patently false in the context of cyberspace. However, just because it requires no balls to send the first email does not mean women are going to start doing it.
Feminine entitlement trumps taking the intiative even when a weasel could take such an initiative, even when his taking the initiative tells her nothing about him and there is no socially intelligent reason to take the back seat, the back seat is where she’ll be.
What the west needs is an end to self-loathing. 2.4 children is a good thing and liberals who say we should recycle our plastic bags to suffocate our kids are wrong and likewise conservatives who want women fast-breeding indoors are equally wrong. There’s nothing at all to loath about the western birth rate and the attitudes which create it, the truth is we don’t need a baby boom or a cull the left and right are both wrong to not accept us as we are.
Fast-breeding and living until 80 is impossible, having a welfare state with open borders is impossible, mass immigration between the wildly different and staggeringly unequal is unsustainable.
A policy of open borders or forced industrialisation towards the worlds fast-breeders will consume the earth. A society where we decide to treat diabetes, cancer and heart disease must be a society of 2.4 children. I’ve done the maths and any aternative is impossible.
They’re the most warranted and loyal immigrants we have if we intend to throw them out we may as well randomly pick names from the Yellow Pages and throw them out too.
The alpha may control less of what you do because the control freak is one example of someone who cannot live with uncertainty at all.
Why I’d be surprised if any alpha put their foot down more than 20% of the time, the rest is supposed to be challenging I believe any alpha would be happier with another alpha if the relationship has to be monogamous.
That totally depends on the nature of the disagreement. Any alpha will adapt to the little things because of don’t sweat the small stuff. The amazon woman will to some extent impersonate the girly girl if this gets her the man she wants and he too would not be ashamed about his feminine side.
The alpha is not somebody who demands everything to be on their own terms it’s somebody who adapts with the stormy billows of life. However, do we raise our kids catholic or do we raise them atheist is something two alphas could easily fight over.
Women try to control what you say. But what you say isn’t you it’s even less likely to be you than what you believe is you, and what you believe is less you than what you do as you. Action reveals the most of what you are, belief is in second, and speech is third.
Anyway women like to operate on multiple levels of superficial total control - I.e. speech control. It’s the bit that is least you which she tries to control and women will object strongly to men who believe they are what they say are. The man who claims to be confident or alpha male will be sorely tested she will object strongly to the way that he speaks of himself. The real power exists between the lines and this is why you must never listen too closely to what is officially stated by a woman or take your own words that seriously. What women hate about free speech is the directness and the frequent claiming to be what you’re not.
If Trump was a plumber he’d probably be like Mike is now. Moaning that the state won’t tax kids enough to pay him a pension that an old man a 16 year old filipina can retire on. But that passport grabbing 16 year old wouldn’t be a model and that’s the difference money makes.
The point of Trump is to thwart good intentions before they create hell, as a person of course he’s a massive nob which if anything that makes him better for the part. We need a suspicious and cynical, mercenary attitude at the border because that’s what’s on the other side of it.
The French might be the turning point because their traditional social democracy that provided a decent standard for ordinary working people survived the 1980s.
France never created a generation of chavs in a culture of mass distraction where 80% of people were made off. Their Thatcherite has to attack the 80% in total but in Britain and America half the white working class were picked off already. Neoliberalism came on in stages here with 30-40% of regular people destroyed decades ago to provide teaching jobs in China for people like Rizlared.
There are too many right-wing "how to fraud your opponent" videos on YouTube it's like Derren Brown doing politics. I can't believe that on an individual level people are going to behave more morally in fact all sides feel more like gangsters since Trump took office. However, in general any system less international will be less corrupt because it's closer to mind and sight and you do also get an advantage when one section of the mob owns the space. People could walk the streets at night when Ronnie and Reggie were around.
The first boomers had the talent and discipline of that strict and often stultifyingly repressed society they grew up in, and then their arts had to meet and beat that society with standards. I suppose the irony is the society they opposed was the reason intellectuals and creatives didn't get beaten up.
Don't know what you're talking about I've never been anywhere more fraternal. You can always depend on the kindness of CS members to do nothing but admire the strengths and talents of others, as we always say the best man won.
Ten minutes with the kid should tell us what the likelihood is, but he should stay with his default gender until at least his teens. Maybe in future when the science can tell us exactly what's what medically and genetically could you be sure enough about a 6 year old.
In a youth is wasted on the young kind of way, yes. If she were to have a teenage eating disorder and a heroin addiction throughout her 20s, by 40 she'd be looking a lot better.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Share What You Are Listening To -- Part 99