People who demand yes-men to stay positive and never criticise are aspiring dictators is my point.
Confused dictators. Your authoritarian personality will likely not be the absolute authority, and what would you do then? Become a yes-man and tyrannise the rank below.
The left is no less sociopathic than the right these days with an equal number of people who would have power at all costs. The liberals may as well have been right wing since they were 6.
They may say everyone’s a winner and you may believe that not being a winner can only be the result of a conspiracy against you.
But you’re wrong. What you’re looking at is tremendous odds and the further you fall behind the more these odds will appear insurmountable and eventually conspiratorial. There is not in actual fact a global conspiracy to keep Romania down.
A small minority always wins the race and the majority lose. That’s capitalism. The problem with global capitalism is that there’s only massive race which yields an unprecedented number of losers with no second chances.
The problem with decoupling from global capitalism is your kids. Future generations will want the shinier shiny that comes from the massive global race and they’ll sell you out to get at it. And that’s why Stalin built a huge wall.
Uneven economic development is an absolute law of capitalism it’s not a conspiracy. There’s always going to be the Brazil and Poland, and then the Bulgaria and Argentinas.
There's something in its critique of capitalism but you're not likely to come up with anything better. Nothing polices people like money can and only rarely can you free people from this duress without them degenerating into a dickhead.
When you actually take money from the rich and give it to the poor, give the working class that breathing space, women then choose to work part-time in a creche. The outcome is in many ways more conservative than the one that comes from being under the boot of the boss.
But the actual socialist is not what a socialist is now particularly in America. By this century it's the few against the many, misfits against the normal, a classroom warfare against the majority who got invited to wicked parties. Nothing they stand for socially supports their economics. Open borders would see something actually socialist - like the NHS - privatised. Feminism and LGBT demonstrate the fact that they're a social cripple.
But this isn't what a socialist is particularly in America. By this century it's the few against the many, a classroom warfare against the majority who got invited to wicked parties. Nothing they stand for socially supports their economics. Open borders would see something actually socialist - like the NHS - privatised eventually. Feminism and LGBT enrage the working class.
Socialism is useless without social trust trust and fellowship. Barracks, villages, homogenous countries, doctor knows best and teacher knows best all share something in common. The "way" is more important than your "way", capitalist diversity and disorganisation would be more trouble than they're worth in certain context.
Excellent bureaucracy. Perfect working order. Honest and direct in conversation, equality between listening and speaking you feel nothing like the American trying to get one over or beat you in some way during friendly conversation.
Added bonus is they have no street cred. If weed was popular amongst the least influential it might actually drive teenagers away from cannabis which is the ideal to keep weed away from the developing.
For pensioners and the disabled maybe. Weed for those who can't really do much in this world, we've been very lucky we don't have to kill them we can afford them to do nothing.
Nicer than we mostly are. It might work wholesale in a village, and it seems to works for children and the sick people you might naturally help not for the money.
It would be more holy to sacrifice the west to universal mankind. Liberals are the missionaries and western society is the sacrificial lamb, for their own security people were always going to backlash against this politics of sacrifice.
A meandering path from cocky to timid for men love is a gradual adding of doubt and growing of the voice in your ear, for women love is the meandering path from grace to filth and back, a confidence that removes all doubt and sense of self-restraint.
I would rather block these appeals even if we give all the money to refugees. It's a display of western privilege for us to spend all this time and money on one traitor whilst millions of innocent people die. The death of this one would not be a tragedy and the millions are not a statistic.
If a disliked foreign power can create victory for both Trump and Brexit this should force you to ask some serious questions about yourself. If your wife leaves you for literally any man who will buy her a drink I'd suggest there's more to it than the drink. You're really not any different to Trump unless you see Trump as a massive wake-up call at the very least.
There's a mystical undertsanding of the world and there's a mechanical understanding of the world - a wisdom of the heart and the wisdom of the head respectively - but the problem is that the mechanical understanding the world of facts we move into as progress unfolds tends to rationalise "chemistry" away. The Western mind of metal rationalises away the meaning of its own existence first and then in the silliness and decadence before the fall it loses this one last thing it does believe in. Rationality. It stands both for and on nothing.
This policy of mixture is as sold as the decadence of Rome. It's not a conspiracy to keep you in little boxes but something that a spoilt, late-stage civilisation always does exhausting the means of what was once its imperial influence. Swamp by mercenaries and minds of money such a civilisation no longer recognises friend from foe.
Through Trump we witness the sort of dumb politics you deserve.
The liberals are the more intelligent idea nobody lives up to. About 5% of the population has an idea of how the world works for all the politesse and education liberals don't know any more than you. The liberals are drowning in their own system they don't have the skill to sustain it.
We need to consider just how completely ineffective actual Christian values would be in the real world. The true believer is Nick Clegg and we hate him. People actually want a confident bad boy to do the necessary evil that needs to be done, he'll be a man who survives by whatever means necessary basically the opposite of Jesus.
Sandal-wearing liberals inhabit the post-christian moral universe where the right is money-minded, Chrisitianity for the right is more like nationalism or supporting a football team. It's a banner for the tribe. Closest to the true believer is rhe do-gooding liberal lefty who isn't working class enough to actually tax the rich to pay for the poor, but instead favours the holy spirit and a vague sense of communitarian goodwill.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Friends - Are they all positive influences?
People who demand yes-men to stay positive and never criticise are aspiring dictators is my point.Confused dictators. Your authoritarian personality will likely not be the absolute authority, and what would you do then? Become a yes-man and tyrannise the rank below.