People are complicated, emotional creatures. But your laptop won't come crying to you and neither will Amazon or Siri, the more time you spend single and accustomed to robotics the less you'll "get" people.
The men in the family are. We're all a peculiar mix of eccentric and strategic, volatile and logical and I find them interesting. 99% of people are boring idiots
Apart from false modesty which is just annoying. Make a song and dance of it we don't need the pretentious that really knows how to kill a vibe. That's what reality is for.
It takes a significant degree of unhappiness to see things as they really are and all your most accurate opinions will be of what you don't like. The depressed are more likely to see the world for what is, but you don't want to be that real. It's a burden.
Government and industry is the BFG I would argue, we seldom experience anything dangerous therefore it is really pretentious to white knight when you'll always know anyway. If something truly dangerous really happened and you got see how people react, you wouldn't be that surprised.
And this is why when a Muslim sets himself on fire and runs towards airport check-in it's a dour working class Scot who punches the man on fire to the ground.
The gritty life on the never-never. That's the only call for the White Knight, and it's the men who live that gritty life on the never-never who do these tremendously brave things it's one reason Jesus loves the poor.
Being in a couple is full of difficulties and comprises that might turn out to be a good thing later. Might.
But freedom particularly in regard to singledom is the path of least resistance. The steady erosion of character and world weighs little against the freedom to do what you want, when you want. Following emancipation comes a period of madness, estrangement and discord, but who knows how future generations will behave.
A simple “oh, I see” accompanied by a face of disappointment will suffice. You seemingly don’t care that much whether she comes to the party or not, the important thing is her perspective the manipulation has to plausibly deniable she has to believe you’re not just saying that because you’re miffed.
That’s a good one. You’re not missing the occasion(the occasion I want you to attend)because you don’t want to or can’t be bothered. No, it’s because you’re a social cripple when someone gives you an answer you don’t want, imply there’s something wrong with them.
I love you is a terrifying thing to say sincerely and that’s why we must never say it apart from early on a first date to get things off to a flying start.
I look at the Greeks, Italians and French as examples of failure. The point-blank refusal to adapt or improve ever.
And I look at Germany and Scandinavia as the best examples of modernisation. To have dealt with the unions without destroying the industry they avoided the volume of “made in China” and YouTube Vloggers we see in Britain and America courtesy of Reagan and Thatcher. Those countries have a better life than we do, a blind man could see that.
We interpret EU rules more liberally than Europe and these interpreters rule the roost after Brexit. We’ll be granting more power to the authority which allowed the Rotherham Evil to happen.
I assume that with sovereignty will come tighter borders and tight borders is what people want. However I care more about what gets done over who does it. Would I reject the EU on principle if it did not support open borders? No. Do I fear the tyranny of Britain’s liberal judiciary in an unleashed Britain? Yes.
I love you therefore you must do such and such, you wouldn’t do that if you loved me. It can be used to emotionally blackmail particularly when love is declared early or often.
Women raise kids to be a law unto themselves and this does not work well for 80% of people who respond productively to feelings of inadequacy. Keeping up with the Jones and rank inadequacy fail the middle classes, aspiration - the sense that you’re not good enough as you are - diminishes around Mums. From here life is more a matter of true calling and society doesn’t resemble the army at all, the rank and file begin to stagnate without the rules and ruthlessness of patriarchy.
It’s basiclaly the fact that you try harder for people who don’t really love you. Patriarchy and the developing world respect their parents more because they love their children less. Their obedience comes from being treated crap whereas our insolence comes from never had it so good.
And yet that's the weird thing. A patriarchy is more likely to have kids purely for the purpose of harvesting their organs but it's the children of matriarchy(children in the West)who behave most like they have parents who don't really love them. Smaller families and the only child may in reality be the main focus of parental care and attention, but try telling them that.
Pro-life is weirdly like cannon fodder in a way, it provides a high quantity of young life which is there to be sacrificed. A scantily insured patriarchy is liable to use their kids for child labour, and what does a heavily insured patriarchy decide to have children for? Their kidneys perhaps.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: why do some people talk about things that happened years ago and blame parents for stuff that is bad
People are complicated, emotional creatures. But your laptop won't come crying to you and neither will Amazon or Siri, the more time you spend single and accustomed to robotics the less you'll "get" people.