One can only hope that, if the justice system fails, that not a single athlete would agree to compete against him ... that might well leave him with a string of VERY hollow medals ?
IT's a fact that sometimes it's cheaper to settle a case rather than slog out to see justice done.
Can't say I know much about TU but that would seem to be the situation here ... easy to blow 25 million on lawyers in such cases and it gets the thing outta the way so he can put more energy into swamp drainin' and infrastructure rebuilding ...
Many women seem so cold these days that it almost seems a waste to bother with expensive processes ... but there ya go!
On a more serious note though ... at the point of the death the spirit / soul leaves the body and while there's many Near Death Experiences reports of a 're-entry' into the when heroic attempts are made to save a life with electroshock and etc, in the main once the soul departs it doesn't return. So ... there might be questions concerning the viability of 'life' unless 'some other spirit' was lingering an opportunistically entered the bosy ... in which the person who paid for the crogenic preservation would become a body donor to a 'randon passing spirit' And, spirits that do not transition properly are rarely happy beings ...
But OK on a more practical note lets imagine that it might be possible that the body could be restarted years later when some 'new cure' has been identified ... but how would that person ( assuming they were still 'themselves') cope if say they died in 2016 and were revived in 2166?
Even the last 30 years has seen previously unheard rates of acceleration in technology, language and social change ... the person would be like a dinosaur ... they'd be unable to cope and so they;d probably be euthanased as they were not able to make any contribution, or imprisoned in a museum as a living curiosity ?
Neither sounds a lot of fun ... but let's hear other possibilties ... what outcomes can you imagine ?
You ... Tolerant ? But only you use the alternative spelling ie 'passive aggressive arrogant rude fart'
The lady happens to be passionate about her country and interested in it's future ... whereas you appear interested only in your own narrow self view and the sound of your own voice.
Of course I don't expect you to take this personally ...
The purpose of the forums are for anyone to express any view they choose, including political, religious, cultural and anything else ... unless admin deem otherwise
If you can't conduct your decently towards a lady then ... be gracious and leave her in peace eh ?
Lesley Stahl was certainly a bit snarky during the 'in between sections' but overall she treated Mr trump with respect.
Reality is she loses viewers which means losing money if he refuses 60 minutes future access ?
And, with talk of the POTUS Press entourage being pruned back I;d guess ALL journalists will be thinking about the cost of their past smarminess and bias!
RE: The people has spoken, Trump our new Leader, Part 2
Hi LJ ... I was just talking to friend in Moscow and they pointed me to some of their local news ... a survey asking Russian people about Mr Trump78% replied that they expected US / RF relationships to either
" Improve " 43% or
" Improve Greatly " 35%
Only about 4% expected a serious decline
I'll see if I can find the link again ( should have tagged it but didn't think at the time )