Patience would be more applicable with quiet people than worried about what a person might think is more appropriate for themselves.
Once a person becomes comfortable and starts to open up, there's no telling what an individual might be in for. Odds could lean more toward them being too much for you to handle vs. the impression they aren't enough and what ever other premature conclusions might have be drawn.
Quiet or not, every one is different. If you don't take the time, you don't know.
She's not a "celebrity" in the light that seems to be desired here and it's not even a crush or a full favorite. I don't generate crushes from television or big screens much.
I smoke. I have certain rules for smoking. The main one is that no smoking indoors ever. I don't care what the weather is out side. I don't own any ashtrays to help keep that rule in effect. No butts all over the place. That's what the butt can out side is for.
I don't care if a woman smokes or not. Those two rules above are the base lines.
For me; the real question is: would a woman like a man smoking or not? It's a two way street.
The U.S. has a garbage misadministration in places they should have and Russia's administration knows this.
It's not a fear factor as far as military. It's an idiot marxist terrorist traitor that should never have been allowed to even breathe in the first place. It's just advantageous to every one but the U.S.
The chinese calenders generally do keep track of planet, star alignments and such. I have noticed there may be some traits that might be able to be pasted to certain birth "signs".
In the end, to me, it's yet another way of profiling that will never be any more fully accurate than another type. It's a different type of profiling. Environment, up bringing, choices, and experiences will still be the primary make up and basis for individual reasoning, actions, and views.
It still comes down to the individuals involved whether friends, enemies, lovers, family, strangers, or acquaintances.
When dealing with malfunctioning machinery and electronics.That's waht can make me the most angry. Luckily, you can't hurt feelings or say anything wrong to machinery or electronics. They can hurt you.
As far as people, especially women, conversation and addressing things openly should be able to bring resolve to most issues. I would expect nothing less from them if it's me. Things will either improve or not.
If it's serious enough and a problem, time to go. Maybe it's just something as simple and obvious as not as compatible as originally viewed.
There isn't much a person can do. It can be a hard call if you should try. Situations and people differ greatly. Try your best if that's what you want. Remember you can't force someone to stay. You can't force love or a relationship if you're the only one that wants it.
Make sure you have lots of time to heal emotionally and intellectually before moving on. This will be best for others as well as your self.
I won't bother with long distance relationships. I prefer with in 25 miles. I haven't had many local women available since I found this site. It's the only one with forums of the three I'm in though.
Women with children aren't a worry or bother either. To make any permanent decisions, there has to be some major permanency established first. It all takes time.
With in a short distance actually allows for me and a significant other to actually get to know each other. It increases availability on both sides. It also helps with space and personal time. I do go out; to movies, bars on occasion, dinner, bowling. I include my daughter for the milder things. I still go even if she's not here. If I have hours to sit in front of computer screen or watch television, I have time to be out here and there.
There most likely are some exceptions that vigilante methods would have better results. The problem is: on individual judgement, they may not truly be "justice".
If it's something close to home and personal; odds are higher that emotions will be high and any type of judgement would be clouded.
It's a hard call. Emotion itself has proven over and over again just how powerful, sometimes wrong, can be.
If it's something on the spot where there is just re-action, that could reasonably change every thing in a dire situation.
I have strong ties with the pentecostal faith. I have also been affiliated with several other faiths.
One thing first and foremost, no matter what denomination a person may choose; read your bible and do not put your faith in any man or church. You have the tool needed to make sound choices. If not used properly, it is on you and no one else. It's not the church or it's leaders that faith and belief is supposed to be focused on.
They are there to help you understand. Confront any teachings that may not be accurate or fully explained. If or when you find repeated flaws that do not coincide, it's time to move on to another if they don't retract or worse. Continuing to push any thing wrongfully is not a place to be. I left my local pentecostal faiths. There is a difference between praising, praying, and chanting.
What you describe is, potentially, a person that literally needs another. A person that has that type of need will do many things to achieve their goal of not being alone. In the end, the facialism is too hard to keep up with. Some may be stronger than others at keeping the act up.
I feel there is always room for a person to grow and learn. Stop doing either one and a person may truly be too old and set. To change others or change myself to be with another isn't an option or thought. Compatibility or the potential for it can only be known or discovered with honesty and being yourself. Standards? It should be natural to not need an act or cover up. Worst case? You may never see or talk with certain people again. That doesn't mean it's bad. It means certain knowledge might have been gained that may be helpful in the future.
People treat each other differently. Some good, bad, indifferently, and even neutrally. No one should stick around if it's bad. It's no longer the other person's fault if an individual stays under disrespectful and hurtful conditions of their own accord. We are only in control of ourselves and our own actions. We hope we're always, mostly in the good.
There's nothing wrong with people deciding not to have children.
Be careful you don't end up with a partner that does. Of course, if a person is with a partner they want and every thing is mutual; what is decided at the moment, could be subject to change, health and years being taken into account.
I have skype and occasionally use it. I don't have to worry about being recorded thanks to the NSA any way. Even if they weren't around; I don't use it or do anything that I have to worry about being recorded. I'm just not paranoid about much of any thing.
This is why I've always preferred dating with closer localities. Online can't fully depict a person's personality any more than writing a book back and forth. It doesn't represent their life style, activities, schedules...etc. It does let you see and talk with the person for a better idea of things.
That doesn't mean there can't be any accuracy. It will always boil down to the person's legitimacy and the over all goal on both sides. Hopefully it is noble but we all know that isn't always the case.
I would be more worried if a person avoided those types of chats. Don't take it for granted every one is on the level because they will either. Another choice of many for people to make.
To use, or not to use? That is the question.
^^^^ whoa just realized how open that plain jane question could be.
If there is anything that I think I need to check what's going on with a partner; it makes more sense to ask them and talk directly.
If things can be settled in a direct approach and there are any problems with trust, which also mean etiquette and respect have been breached; it's time to no longer be with that person for both of our sakes. I don't have to wonder and they no longer have to sneak.
Most likely, the judges are aware of how every one is getting to the start. They would also be informed of any malfunctions or worse. Most likely going to sit it out and wait until the issue is fixed or they ride in with other equipment to get us down.
Trying anything "daring" at this point could backfire. Especially if the lift starts running again while acting on it. There's no way I would try releasing the break and think about securing a rope or something to try pulling the lift the rest of the way up the hill, or even being on the cables at all. Yeah, sitting it out sounds good.
The only other option would depend on the ground being really close and not too far up the hill to the starting point of the event. That might be somewhat reasonable but also unlikely.
Democrats forced the shut down and boehner is working for the misadministration in the white house plain and simple.
Ted Cruz and others tried warning the U.S. citizens what obummercare and more will do to the citizens and nation on a large scale.
So here we are, in the U.S., over $17 trillion dollars in debt and growing. What? What's that? We can't even keep citizens working with out them being taxed to death and hours cut but we need immigration reform? More costs to the tax payers. obummer cut nothing that a sequester didn't force.
Keep supporting the marxist regime for those that do. Not much longer and many will learn the hard way that nothing is free. The government doesn't have any money. It's based off, yes, that word, capitalism.
That means people work for living to support their families with opportunities to increase their educational levels and experience for better jobs. Better jobs used to use healthcare and other perks as incentive for people to want to do better. The money the government keeps promising that they don't have is from the taxes that working people, other agency types, and businesses pay in. It's called revenues. When the government spends more than it takes in, like obummer supporting terrorists and development of other countries over the nation and citizens itself, it continually creates debt. That debt continually rolls onto the tax payer.
With out jobs for the citizens first, there will be no recovery for the nation.
Draegoneer Forum Posts (1,371)
RE: Who viewed u last?
A scammer with no photo. Go figure....