Basically put there's less to go wrong with the young and thin. However flawlessness - which is the main aim of the game - is not quite the same thing as beauty. It's a design for beauty absent of the mysterious quality. You won't get the person with a big nose that works really well on their face for some reason.
Most models are tall and out of work by 25. It's the beanstalk appearance of a tall teenager whose growth is almost entirely in height not weight.
But why? On the one hand that's a symbol of prosperity. To hit puberty early and grow tall is the tendency of an environment perfect for life, it's what a body does when everything is right so don't change a thing. And on the other hand it's standardisation. The thin look more alike it's easier to design a range clothing that will fit 20 different thin people.
Although even here I wish Boris could be a bit more like Thatcher. Take the short-term hit to your approval rating because you yourself actually believe in something. It'll be the correct thing to do anyway. Whoever kicks us through covid school will be thanked by history. We simply must stop deferring every hurty hurty.
As for the queues I would say that's an argument for priority. Who really needs the booster medically as in to save their life? And who is getting it done to lower infection rates a.k.a improving the electability of the Tory party?
If we struggle with omicron it means that vaccines are not as good as was claimed, and South Africa's higher rate of natural immunity is actually quite a lot better. If we struggle it proves how natural infection provides a comprehensive education to the immune system far better than having the answers written down on a sheet of paper like the vaccine. And if we don't struggle with it then what's the trauma?
All seems a bit dicey to me. The vaccine isn't going to do as much as for you, but you don't need it to because the illness is milder, therefore you must get a vaccine.
Thinking long-term I don't know why anybody would want to miss the chance of building natural immunity through omicron. Apart from big pharma. Going to covid school may never be this simple again, it's dropped into a lower stream for the remedials.
And that's worth a mention because nothing undermines the idea that other people are just as important as me better than being on an online dating site. It zones in on human nature at the maximum of inequality namely when a man is willing to laugh at anything if it ends in a suck job. That's the foundation of the relationship.
Men should intelligently disobey "no means no" that's what I was trying to say to you.
But then what is the difference between intelligent disobedience and narcissistic disobedience? The latter expects complete and total obedience from others.
Whoever came after British Leyland is going to look superb. But it was the smashing turned into looting that I'm not happy out. They stole the house. And now all our utilities are still by owned a government, it's just a foreign government. All our energy prices at the mercy of the french taxpayer.
Sympathetic. They've had a hard life I'm guessing.
Which I would follow with feelings of ambiguity. Are they really good or are they really bad? Hell only makes it possible to be either one thing or the other. Either way it's going to make me talking about my problems sound frankly ridiculous.
He's alright in small doses. It's like somebody spliced the genes of an intellectual with Donald Trump - deep and meaningless but larger than life at the same time.
Society needs to be much more prosperous in general to wanna hear about how being materially privileged has left you emotionally neglected. Harry's crying is not going to go down well unless a lot more people become middle class a lot more easily.
I don't really see a Britain that became more productive, more a Britain where being productive doesn't really matter.
The big difference between social democracy and neoliberalism was the division of spoils. The good side of town got better without having to be any good, the poor side went to the dogs. Before Thatcher the spoils were much more universal whereas after they were more particular. If you happened to own a property in London you became instantly upper middle class. You became very wealthy through a system that transferred the future from the west to the east. As a temporary middle man.
There are other countries that managed to deal with the trade unions without destroying the factory and surrounding community.
And who are Thatchers babies? They're either chavs or woke kids from the middle class. We have been divided into a degenerated working class and this woke middle class whose parents were this fake teacher, this middle class that wasn't. Woke is gravely mistaken to believe it can repeat their parents lack of competence and still be middle class.
They discovered that a higher rate of usury could be drawn from sweating the east instead of equipping the west. And how's that worked out?
Nowadays we are discovering the costs of making life piss easy for a bit. Having a ballooned middle class that was never any good. You're a teacher because you one speak one language; English. Where do you think this came from? Crap middle class
Probably necessary at the time but today our greatest flaws are a lack of industry and a lack of social housing. We have a flu going around that came from China and they were equipped by Thatcher and Blair, the latter being described by Thatcher as "one of us".
I do enjoy having my opinions questioned because that means we share the same interest. It's helps if she likes politics, not my politics, just politics in general. There's a good chance that the one who agrees with my politics has just found the fastest way to get me to stop talking.
Or that we're both a morning person. We run on a similar body clock. That's important. Similar in general as though we could live together, but dissimilar in detail so as to bring different things to the table.
And perhaps what Diana was is a bit saturated by now. I'll bet William comes off better than Harry in these troubled times simply for not behaving like the times.
And I think a lot of what Diana was is now found in the Kardashian dynasty. But even here are our influencers are far more competitive. It's not like the old days of tv where they would watch somebody less interesting than the person next to them, and applaud like mad. We have options.
Still an old democratic socialist I guess. Diana was a part time job most people would have done for far less money.
Anyway it's nothing on the influence of David Bowie. Turned down a knighthood on the merits of his ability. One of the most worthy celebrities ever to have lived, he actually did something and if anybody was right about the future it's him.
Yes. Life has a will of its own not in the control of academia or the aristocracy, or the Fuhrer. The destiny of the world is within man, not one man or group of men, but in all men.
28 times more than the previously infected. Obviously the sticking point there is that you have to get infected first.
Which is why they're trying to keep omicron down. On the one hand it's a live vaccine that will give humanity far greater protection without making anybody any profit, and on the other hand it's nature asking you to grasp the nettle. When everything we have known is debt and how to defer all problems to a later date.
Someone more/less appropriate. You could call her a prude, you could call him disgusting. Beauty and the beast is the extreme example of how men and women are in moderation.
The trap that I see is mental illness because we accept it verbally without thinking what it means. It won't become fine by saying it's fine that's not how tolerance works. In fact it will clash completely with today's neo-puritan creed. The pronoun offences etc. When it comes to living with mental illness, instead of talking about mental illness, fine is the last thing it will be. This is in contrast to the thick skin of the old days where it would tolerate someone behaving mad so long as they didn't identify as mad.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Supermodels
Basically put there's less to go wrong with the young and thin. However flawlessness - which is the main aim of the game - is not quite the same thing as beauty. It's a design for beauty absent of the mysterious quality. You won't get the person with a big nose that works really well on their face for some reason.