Gaza !! Israel kills civilians ,, among international silence .. What do you think ? share ! ( Archived) (814)

Well said....and I agree....to control and oppress....over land...land which means more than human lives...doesn't make much sense does it...when the value of human life boils down to meaning less than the ground we walk on...that's the bottom line of it...after weeding through all of the bull that surrounds it all....

Good Morning...and yes..there far less seekers of peace in the world than there are people willing to go to war...and human life becomes but a statistic...and for what????


Don't think of retiring from the world until the world will be sorry that you retire. I hate a fellow whom pride or cowardice or laziness drive into a corner, and who does nothing when he is there but sit and growl. Let him come out as I do, and bark.

~Samuel Johnson-


We've got to take back the ideal of justice, we've got to take back this principle of human dignity. We've got to take it back from vengeance, from hatred, we've got to say: look, we're all in this together. We are human beings.

-David Kaczynski-


Two great quotes that sum it up better than I can....Have a great day bud....Oh and I will never be silent about the things I believe are wrong...

I think if you shoot rockets into another country then you have to expect repercussions.
I think if you put your weapons and military offices among civilians then you have to expect civilians to get killed when your enemy shoots back at you.
I think if you're a little weak country and you shoot at a bigger stronger country then you're not very intelligent.

How is that a barbaric statment to say if a member of your family is murdered by the israelis you might feel a slight propensity towads hate??Maybe murdering a family member in israeli is conducive with mutual feelings of love and repsect towards the perpetrators as you bury them in the soil???
The only thing that is barbarous is defunct attitude and views

In Los Angeles they would have long ago...

After wading through these posts , most of which I find totally irrational, totally prejudiced and vindictive bordering on the hysterical nearly incomprehensible hatred of Arabs, Muslims and especially Palestinians, both Christian and Muslim. Makes me wonder just how many are possibly active agents of the Zionist disease promoting the total destruction of Palestine in every form possible, then to move on to destroy both Arabs and Muslims all in the name of 'democracy', 'freedom' and of course Israel....
Some observations: An exceedingly arrogant contempt for the past seems to be the characteristic of these 'modern times'. Our collective success in developing chemical, electronic and mechanical technologies has produced in most an idea that no one before us was of any importance. In fact, however, human nature has changed little in the last four thousand years and the history of these four millennia teems with situations similar to those which repeatedly confront us all today, right now.
Another factor essential to the comprehension of modern problems is the realization of the rather insidious influence still exerted today on the mentality of most non Catholic populations of Europe and North America by events which occurred many centuries ago. The 'Old Testament", for example, still profoundly and dangerously directs the psychology of those who advocate an Israli dominated Middle East at best or a Zionist dominated 'World Order" at worst as a means to your country's and your own personal biblical interpretation along with an almost murderous fanaticism lust to always be on the winning side.No matter how wrong it may be seen by others, much less 'your' victims of 'liberation' and 'your' version of 'democracy'. For these reasons, I am not really surprised at the immense number; thousands upon thousands of books written about the "Palestine Problem", which commence in 1917; which seek to justify the deconstruction and annihilation of Palestine and of its peoples.
Words are very deceptive at times. "Nation", for example, can mean the inhabitants of a certain area, which is controlled by one government. This political use of "nation" then has no ethnic significance. But "nation" is also used in the exact opposite to indicate an ethnic group, people all descended from the same ancestors, although not all under one government. The word "people" is even more confusing. I recently heard a lecture given by a Jew, whose object was to prove that Jews today are a "people", not a "nation". He appeared to mean that they were a definite community, though not of one ethnic origin. A German writer complains that the German "people" are still divided up in several, mostly artificially created 'countries'. He presumably means the word "people" to signify a single ethnic stock.
"We" are not entirely justified in laying the blame on the intractable mentality of "Arabs" and "Jews", as opposed to those who are committed to a belief in the so called 'holiness' of Zionism. For a great part of our difficulties are due to this age in which we all live, to the rampant, unquenchable thirst for materialism, the popularity of cynicism and the unscrupulous, murderous politics, which, in their turn, are traceable to the near total abandonment of belief in one God, not some localized tribal psychotic 'god' that is in no way conceivable, a Universal God. For men, if they lose sight of the Spiritual, behave to one another like wild beasts.
Vague words are of particular importance in the Palestine dispute because both sides have and are frequently using them with vastly different meanings and connotations, sometimes with the deliberate intention to mislead, I find that in order to communicate effectively, one must know the not only their own language properly, but to fully comprehend their own words so as not to create verbal quibbles in order to intentionally deceive or not, but to assure universal understanding and comprehension.