rohaan Forum Posts (10,561)
WL:Wood & Lamping Attorneys At Law——- “The Clash Between Service Animals And Allergies In The Workplace”. Condensed ( by myself) — reasonable accommodation MUST be provided to BOTH. However, there can be no expectation that the employee (with the allergy) seek another job, as that is NOT considered to be reasonable. 
Hmmm...it sort of leaves it at loose ends, because interpretation of what is reasonable is different case-by-case. So, what the law firm is suggesting is that the person with the animal may come in, as long as the allergic person is not affected by the animal, nor is compelled to work in another area or seek other work. Now, how does the business make that happen?
Also, like you, I’ve grown a bit, and it doesn’t bother me as much as it did when I joined CS. It’s still worth it for the great friends on here, and conversation, if polite, is a cool thing.
). Skedaddle says m’yowdy...
look, in the midst of this oft miserable existence, we find humor and mirth, we name places “ Pleasant Valley”, “ Sunrise Lane”, “Morning Glory Beach”... ever faithful that Life is good, even in the very face of tragedy. Am I right?
What statistic are you specifically asking me for? My medical profile? I understand you seeing yourself as objective. It reminds me of a college paper I received back..though it was given an A-, it was marked all over with comments from the doctor/professor with, “Oh really? Who says”? And, “Too shallow. Unsubstantiated. Support this”, and such. Cognitive structuring ain’t my first rodeo. Tell you what, though..I kind of like you. Intelligence is attractive...
I just did it— I guess I probably have done it b4, just not really thinking about it
This is a list of forum posts created by rohaan.
Service Animals
I’m opposed to cases being decided by precedent. It appears that the majority of stalemate cases of this kind are usually settled in favor of the person needing the service animal. I suppose one could think of it in terms of riding a bus, airplane, subway, or renting an apartment, etc...where there are bound to be some people close by who are allergic. It would be ridiculously untenable to expect the foresight of this, so I kind of “get it” that the service animal would certainly prevail. It’s not, in my view, about who “deserves” the greater priority, but what cognitive thinking would dictate as “what is reasonable”. However, because this is The United States, I believe each individual case should be heard on its own merit, as constitutionally orchestrated, rather than being decided “on precedent”, which can be, and often is, far too broad.