Yes, I agree. Certainly, patterns are followed sometimes and most of those times people are unaware of following them at all.
My sister left home when she was 16, mainly due to horrific arguments with my father who was controlling, bad-tempered, narrow minded and selfish, Im sorry to say.
She is now married to a religious fanatic who keeps her in virtual seclusion, doesnt like her watching tv, wearing make up, dressing colorfully, doesnt allow their children to be schooled away from the home..
Jealousy in a relationship stems from insecurity, I believe, so if you want to make it work you both have to address it. The person who is jealous needs to look at the reasons WHY they are like that and address them, and the partner, needs to reassure them and give them confidence.
However, it cannot be an ongoing thing, and sooner or later one has to "get over it". Some people are jealous of their partner because they feel unworthy of love; that needs dispelling by their partner as best as possible.
But, saying that, I dont think anyone should put up with ongoing jealousy; it can be a big deal breaker and is a much bigger sign of underlying emotional issues that simply a little bit of Green Eye.
Yes, and I think this can be such a huge stumbling block in a new relationship: the desire to change the other, attempt to "morph" them into images of themselves.
Sometimes, its hard to relate but the differences are to be celebrated and not blurred into inexistence.
I like the phrase "You protest too much", and use it sometimes. I also relate it to CS postings and life in general: I believe the louder one denies something, the more likely it can be true. For instance, those ladies who claim endlessly they dont like men: it usually stems from a past hurt and they do in fact crave a male's companionship.
That seems to be something that I have come across before: wimmin who dont sometimes want to go out and do their own thing but dont want their men to do so either.
Sorry, I dont understand your reasoning with this...
An engagement ring is part of a oontract; a contract with your lady to get married, where both parties are aware (or should be) that it is a contract for a lifetime committment to each other.
When an engagement ring is "given" in this scenario, it is not "gifted"; it is passed on with the expectation of something. If that something is not received, then the contract has been broken and the ring part should be returned.
I have read up on this, and here the law is generally that an engagement ring is given in contemplation of something else; a verbal contract, and therefore is NOT an unconditional gift.
There is also the moral standpoint; many ladies seem to want these grosely expensive engagement rings, which I personally think is riduculous anyway unless you are marrying Donald Trump. If a man spent a large amount of money, or saved up or dented his credit card to get the lady the ring she desired, then I feel morally, if the engagement was broken off by the lady she should have the decency to return it, or at least offer to return it.
Engagement rings, wedding dresses and weddings in general have just got so ridiculous now in cost; too many people marry for these reasons rather than the correct reason to want to marry someone: LOVE.
Bodecia Forum Posts (1,476)
What REEEEALLY Pees You Off About Wimmin...
Hi, BB.Yes, I agree. Certainly, patterns are followed sometimes and most of those times people are unaware of following them at all.
My sister left home when she was 16, mainly due to horrific arguments with my father who was controlling, bad-tempered, narrow minded and selfish, Im sorry to say.
She is now married to a religious fanatic who keeps her in virtual seclusion, doesnt like her watching tv, wearing make up, dressing colorfully, doesnt allow their children to be schooled away from the home..
Strange, that.