But, marriages that were made 50/60 years ago lasted till death did them part, of course some were not the happy marriage we all seek, but a by far larger number were.
My parent Married during the war, and are still together, 68 years nearly, they have rows, sometime massive ones, but they always, always, work things out hug and make up.
My parents know each other better than they do themselves
And in all fairness. my father was a great father, he played with me as a small child, taught me engineering and design when I was able to grasp the theory. Yes he was the breadwinner But my mother worked relentlessly throughout her life with voluntary organisations, without my fathers support those organisations would have lost out greatly.
But at the same time, a person should be allowed to defend themselves against an unsubstantiated statement, without being accused of being lacking in love.
I did read, the whole thread before I posted, I always do when entering late into a debate
I based my statement on your collective posts
You have showed little or no respect towards women as a whole
And I did not take that sentence out of context, its exactly as you said
If you did not wish to put across the notion of being a control freak then you should change the way you put forward your argument
Because the way it reads shouts out "Control"
However, having said all that
I would agree that the basic premise that Eastern European women's attitude towards marriage is an old fashioned one is to a degree correct.
The main difference being that they work as a partnership towards keeping a marriage solid
That rather than run away when things start to go stale or wrong, they work with their husband to bring things back to an even level, so, in many cases do western women, but sometimes it is made too easy to just walk away and start again in the west.
Yes I so agree J, I would though admit that I can become abrasive when posts contain blatant Lies or Misquotes, because I want to debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about. And I am open minded enough to sway and change my mind if the opposing argument is strong enough and presented in a logical and knowledgeable fashion.
I have noticed on many threads that some seem to think that because there has been a clash of opinions or thoughts, it shows a lack of love. And may even be classed as hatred
This really (in all seriousness) bothers me,
Are some saying that in order to show or feel love that they are no longer to form an opinion and voice that opinion.
Do some think that because there is a clash of thoughts then that MUST lead to some form of hatred, violence even.
I would say that personally, I am one of the least violent persons within the CS walls, I can put hand on heart and say, I have never hated anyone in my entire life. I have never hit anyone either, thats not to say I weak or a coward, I just use words to place my side of a discussion, always have always will.
I genuinely believe that I have a huge capacity to love, and I am really puzzled that some would suggest that just because those that enter a debate on a forum show they are incapable of love.
Oh you are so wrong, I am sitting here on a plastic bag because I'm so close to pissing myself with laughter with the utter rubbish your coming out with..
If Iwas to lash out believe me you would know, I am playing with you as a cat toys with a mouse, I have spent years studying the ancient religions, the witchcraft and such pre the roman invasion of England. I have travelled and followed many of the Templars routes across the Mediterranean.
I have no problem with you believing that you here voices in your head, in fact, I would be struck dumb if you hadn't, my only dislike of your posts is that you are misquoting and speaking about things you patently fail to understand.
Think what you like, but don't go telling everyone else they are wrong unless you have heavy proof to back up your statements
Of course I am not calling myself a knight of Templar, where on earth did that come from, I understand now how you have come up with so many idiotic statements, you obviously have an inability to both read and assimilate that information at the same time.
Send me you email and I'll send you a ladybird book with the details , you may be able to follow that.
How or why would I know your Father, do you know mine? no so whats the point of that discussion.
And I speak with the tongue of Satan? well I would need to believe in him to do that and well sorry but thats just not going to happen.
Lady, I can run rings around every argument you have put forward and believe me, I haven't started yet. Go back to reading your copy of Chariots of the Gods.
The Knights Templar were created appox 1000 AD, thats after Christ. how on earth could Jesus have been one, who in the world of fantasy has been feeding you such misinformation.
Please go back and read before you post any more utter rubbish.
You see only what you want to see, you don't read the whole treads, hence your aggression at my post on another thread, which was totally uncalled for.
I have no problem with Trish and have told her so, I like a lot of her posts, and as for BA, I admire much that he says and have had some great debates over the months.
I have no time however for people who spout utter driveel and are completely unable to back up there diatribe.
Your heroine, Calls the Knights of Templer Saviours, what crap is that, they were a group of knights who went to fight in the crusades, yer, thats a great choice to follow, Believe in my faith or die, they established castles throughout the Mediterranean region, to enable themselves and followers to shower vengeance on those that failed to follow them.
You want a history lesson? Go read the book, study, its what I did, it opened my eyes to religions and false worship.
The only excuse for such idiotic verbal diarrhoea, is that you hit the egnog a few days early
Dare I wish you a happy Christmas or will Luke skywalker descend from the heavens above and slay me with his light sabre , for speaking of such a Christian event.
Posted this in the INT section but as its quiet in here thought it might entertain
So I was at a bar the other night, for a meal as I was feeling to lazy to cook, and was tucking into my Steak, so rare I had to hold it down with the fork to stop it from walking cross the table, with a greeny mouldy growth that here in England they call a side salad. Boy do I miss those salads you get in the US, when in Austin there was a steak bar where the salad was an entire three course meal in itself.
Anyway, in walked two stunning women, mid thirties, dressed to kill at 1000 paces and they knew it, not even bothering to look around they just knew that they had created an impact as soon as they entered.
They sat down at a table with glasses of wine and chatted amiably, and a few moments latter two guys walked in and immediately walked over to them, both were tall, blond and even to me good looking, brothers by the look of it.
They greeted the girls with handshakes all round and sat down, now this is where it gets interesting, because I could see both the girls faces, one directly in front of me, we can call her Tracey, the other, lets call her Cherie, in the mirror behind..
When your eating alone its fun to people watch, yes you can read a paper or book but what is happening around you is so much more entertaining.
So, I watched, and there it was, tiny, but definitely there, looks that were passed between the ladies, Tracey was saying “what do you think” Cherie replies “ Yep these will do” then as their meal progressed, they were eating a Mexican concoction which looked awful but smelt really quite nice, Cherie, the mirror one, looked at the Tracey and immediately, Tracey got up and invited Cherie to accompany her to the washroom.
Now this is the time the guys started to talk, loads of hand movements etc, it was extremely funny to me, when the girls returned, normality between the guys reigned supreme again.
Now the ladies were different, leaning forward more to the guy opposite, more eye contact, brushing hair away from their face, it was obvious to me that they had also had a discussion and had decided to pull these lucky chaps.
But, and this is the part where I was speechless, there was this look from one of the girls to the other that I interpreted as “Okay I am ready to leave now” Tracey obviously agreed. Then Tracey looked up and smiled at me, she just knew that I had been watching, there was a look on her face that said “ I know exactly what you are doing and thinking,” and it was at that point that I realised that an entire conversation had just gone on between them and then me, without words, using a mobile, sign language or any other discernable communication devise
online today!rizlared Forum Posts (5,588)
RE: No good single women anymore looking for a decent guy ?
There is much truth in what your say JBut, marriages that were made 50/60 years ago lasted till death did them part, of course some were not the happy marriage we all seek, but a by far larger number were.
My parent Married during the war, and are still together, 68 years nearly, they have rows, sometime massive ones, but they always, always, work things out hug and make up.
My parents know each other better than they do themselves
And in all fairness. my father was a great father, he played with me as a small child, taught me engineering and design when I was able to grasp the theory.
Yes he was the breadwinner
But my mother worked relentlessly throughout her life with voluntary organisations, without my fathers support those organisations would have lost out greatly.