Zeelander: And as for you ... there is never ever a reason for anyone to ever reply to your comments since all you need to do is to dictate what others do since you can't even run your own life successfully.So take this as a last reply.
Zeelander: And as for you ... there is never ever a reason for anyone to ever reply to your comments since all you need to do is to dictate what others do since you can't even run your own life successfully.So take this as a last reply.
And you're an expert to how she runs her life how?
kidatheart: Would it make a difference if it was a new VCR, or a DVD player, or a new car?
Well honestly, a car I could understand kid, because if someone steals your car, they are then messing with you being able to provide for your family as far as you getting to your job. But I do understand the principle to what you are saying and agree.
kidatheart: Would it make a difference if it was a new VCR, or a DVD player, or a new car?
I would guess that is where personal choice come into play. It also depends on how the act of theft is being committed and where the act is being committed.
Are you condoning theft?
It is really a personal choice on how a person wants to acquire things. There are certain career paths that contain certain consequences.
Zeelander: I would guess that is where personal choice come into play. It also depends on how the act of theft is being committed and where the act is being committed.
Are you condoning theft?
It is really a personal choice on how a person wants to acquire things. There are certain career paths that contain certain consequences.
I don't think he is condoning theft, but simply asking if taking a life is worth it when you could simply allow law enforcement to handle the situation (that they are trained to handle) instead of making yourself the judge, jury & executioner.
Zeelander: I would guess that is where personal choice come into play. It also depends on how the act of theft is being committed and where the act is being committed.
Are you condoning theft?
It is really a personal choice on how a person wants to acquire things. There are certain career paths that contain certain consequences.
Not condoning theft at all, and I think you'd be smart enough to understand that. I'm just saying material possessions are not worth killing someone over.
Self defence, or the protection of another are the only instances where taking another person's life would be justified.
Zeelander: Let me get this straight... you are condoning the act of theft as long as no one is hurt physically?
We are going right off topic here --- What I am suggesting is that agression vehicles have no place- however safe they may be purported to be in solving human problems
kidatheart: Not condoning theft at all, and I think you'd be smart enough to understand that. I'm just saying material possessions are not worth killing someone over.
Self defence, or the protection of another are the only instances where taking another person's life would be justified.
brucedavis57south st. Paul, Minnesota USA132 posts
Having guns for hunting and even having a rifle around the home for protection is ok. However, the concealed weapons, like hand guns, should not be allowed. whats wrong with using just harsh language.
Ridge138: I ask that everyone only post their views on the subject,and remember to respect each other. I'm pro-firearms,I don't own them for hunting and target shooting alone,I own them for defense of my life,my rights,and my country. Anyone else a gun owner?
Strange,there are such a few people here in Europe owning a gun and can you imagine we dont need a gun here to protect ourselves, are you surprised now
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).